Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #225422

Re: SANE default scanner

From Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: SANE default scanner
Date 2020-07-28 16:20 +0200
Message-ID <AxyCv-3Yv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <Axekq-8rR-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxixH-2FX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Axjk6-2WD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxjN8-3mk-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxwKl-2QD-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


>> >> The problem is with scanner that are
>> I'm not sure where you found assignment of blame in what I wrote.
> "The problem is" is an assignment of technical blame.

I was just pointing out in which circumstances the problem appears.
No blame was meant and when I reread it I don't see blame being
assigned either.

>> Apparently not 100% so since it works if you provide the URI explicitly.
> Most applications do not allow to specify an arbitrary scanner URL.

The fact that you sometimes can, seems a clear indication that the
underlying design still makes it possible: you just need a bit of code
somewhere in SANE so you can specify this URL in a more central place
than on the command line.  IOW, a trivial new feature.

> The fact that this option did not exist first and before probing is what
> I call a design mistake.

You're free to do so, but usually "design mistake" refers to a problem
whose consequences can only be addressed properly by a redesign, which
implies a significant rework of the code.

> And the fact that hpaio relies on CUPS is inexcusable.

I don't see why: first, AFAICT it is still fully functional without
CUPS, and the fact that it tries to make use of CUPS's config
information in order to overcome specifically the problem you're in is
not dangerous.  It's kind of hackish but I can't see any situation where
it would harm any(think|one), so I'm not sure why you'd find
it inexcusable.

> There is no doubt it can be done. I just doubt it will.

Maybe if you write a patch and submit it along with your
bug-report/feature-request there's more chance it will?
And if you can't do it yourself, why not pay someone to do it for you?

Also, maybe if you stop accusing people of incompetence or gross
negligence (which is what "inexcusable" and "design mistake" evokes for
me), they'll be more accommodating?



        Stefan

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 12:00 +0200
  Re: SANE default scanner Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> - 2020-07-27 14:00 +0200
    Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 14:50 +0200
      Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 15:00 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 15:00 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 15:30 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2020-07-27 15:10 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 15:30 +0200
      Re: SANE default scanner Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> - 2020-07-27 15:10 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-07-27 15:30 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 15:40 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 16:00 +0200
            Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 16:30 +0200
              Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 17:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 18:10 +0200
              Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 17:40 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> - 2020-07-27 16:50 +0200
            Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 17:00 +0200
              Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-27 17:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 17:30 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-27 18:10 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-27 18:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 19:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 18:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-27 23:10 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-28 00:00 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-28 00:30 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-28 14:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-28 16:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-28 21:30 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-29 11:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-07-29 12:10 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-29 20:30 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-07-29 21:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-07-28 09:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 18:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 18:50 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 19:10 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 19:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 20:00 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 19:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-28 14:20 +0200
              Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 20:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 21:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-07-27 21:20 +0200
      Re: SANE default scanner John Boxall <jboxall47@gmail.com> - 2020-07-27 15:30 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 15:40 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2020-07-29 00:00 +0200
  Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 19:40 +0200
    Re: SANE default scanner Siard <shiems@mailbox.org> - 2020-07-27 20:00 +0200
  Re: SANE default scanner Siard <shiems@mailbox.org> - 2020-07-27 19:40 +0200
  Re: SANE default scanner George Shuklin <george.shuklin@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 17:20 +0200
    Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-08-07 17:30 +0200

csiph-web