Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #225475

Re: SANE default scanner

From <tomas@tuxteam.de>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: SANE default scanner
Date 2020-07-29 12:10 +0200
Message-ID <AxRc5-6Ti-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <Axjk6-2WD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxjN8-3mk-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxwKl-2QD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxyCv-3Yv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxQpI-6nF-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:11:22AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Stefan Monnier (12020-07-28):
> > The fact that you sometimes can, seems a clear indication that the
> > underlying design still makes it possible [...]

> "Significant" is a subjective threshold. Probing is less reliable than
> configuration: relying on probing first is a mistake. Call it design or
> not if you will.

i.e. "explicit is better than implicit"

> It completely depends on the mindset of the project, I am waiting to get
> a feel of it. Some projects have a patch welcome attitude, some do not.
> More importantly, some project have the attitude "I do not need this,
> but if you think you do, and your patch is clean and does not make the
> rest of the code more complex, then ok", while others have the attitude
> "I do not need this, therefore nobody does" and would reject the patch.

Quite long-winded way to say "would they accept my patch?" ;-)

> If the patch is to be rejected, or just ignored, then my time would be
> better invested in an external work-around, it would be less effort than
> forking, and more convenient.

I'd just ask them. I.e. explicit is better than implicit.

If you need a second pair of eyes to look over your patch, I'm ready. I
can read C.

Cheers
-- t

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 12:00 +0200
  Re: SANE default scanner Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> - 2020-07-27 14:00 +0200
    Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 14:50 +0200
      Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 15:00 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 15:00 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 15:30 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2020-07-27 15:10 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 15:30 +0200
      Re: SANE default scanner Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> - 2020-07-27 15:10 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-07-27 15:30 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 15:40 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 16:00 +0200
            Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 16:30 +0200
              Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 17:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 18:10 +0200
              Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 17:40 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> - 2020-07-27 16:50 +0200
            Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 17:00 +0200
              Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-27 17:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 17:30 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-27 18:10 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-27 18:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 19:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 18:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-27 23:10 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-28 00:00 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-28 00:30 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-28 14:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-28 16:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-28 21:30 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-29 11:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-07-29 12:10 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-29 20:30 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-07-29 21:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-07-28 09:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 18:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 18:50 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 19:10 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 19:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 20:00 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 19:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-28 14:20 +0200
              Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 20:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 21:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-07-27 21:20 +0200
      Re: SANE default scanner John Boxall <jboxall47@gmail.com> - 2020-07-27 15:30 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 15:40 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2020-07-29 00:00 +0200
  Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 19:40 +0200
    Re: SANE default scanner Siard <shiems@mailbox.org> - 2020-07-27 20:00 +0200
  Re: SANE default scanner Siard <shiems@mailbox.org> - 2020-07-27 19:40 +0200
  Re: SANE default scanner George Shuklin <george.shuklin@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 17:20 +0200
    Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-08-07 17:30 +0200

csiph-web