Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #225471

Re: SANE default scanner

From Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: SANE default scanner
Date 2020-07-29 11:20 +0200
Message-ID <AxQpI-6nF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <AxixH-2FX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Axjk6-2WD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxjN8-3mk-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxwKl-2QD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxyCv-3Yv-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Stefan Monnier (12020-07-28):
> The fact that you sometimes can, seems a clear indication that the
> underlying design still makes it possible: you just need a bit of code
> somewhere in SANE so you can specify this URL in a more central place
> than on the command line.  IOW, a trivial new feature.

> You're free to do so, but usually "design mistake" refers to a problem
> whose consequences can only be addressed properly by a redesign, which
> implies a significant rework of the code.

"Significant" is a subjective threshold. Probing is less reliable than
configuration: relying on probing first is a mistake. Call it design or
not if you will.

> I don't see why: first, AFAICT it is still fully functional without
> CUPS,

Not for GUI applications that do not let set an arbitrary URL.

> Maybe if you write a patch and submit it along with your
> bug-report/feature-request there's more chance it will?

It completely depends on the mindset of the project, I am waiting to get
a feel of it. Some projects have a patch welcome attitude, some do not.
More importantly, some project have the attitude "I do not need this,
but if you think you do, and your patch is clean and does not make the
rest of the code more complex, then ok", while others have the attitude
"I do not need this, therefore nobody does" and would reject the patch.

If the patch is to be rejected, or just ignored, then my time would be
better invested in an external work-around, it would be less effort than
forking, and more convenient.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 12:00 +0200
  Re: SANE default scanner Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> - 2020-07-27 14:00 +0200
    Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 14:50 +0200
      Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 15:00 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 15:00 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 15:30 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2020-07-27 15:10 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 15:30 +0200
      Re: SANE default scanner Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> - 2020-07-27 15:10 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-07-27 15:30 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 15:40 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 16:00 +0200
            Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 16:30 +0200
              Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 17:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 18:10 +0200
              Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 17:40 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> - 2020-07-27 16:50 +0200
            Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 17:00 +0200
              Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-27 17:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 17:30 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-27 18:10 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-27 18:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 19:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 18:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-27 23:10 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-28 00:00 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-28 00:30 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-28 14:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-28 16:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-28 21:30 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-29 11:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-07-29 12:10 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-29 20:30 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-07-29 21:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-07-28 09:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 18:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 18:50 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 19:10 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 19:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 20:00 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 19:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-28 14:20 +0200
              Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 20:40 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-07-27 21:20 +0200
                Re: SANE default scanner Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-07-27 21:20 +0200
      Re: SANE default scanner John Boxall <jboxall47@gmail.com> - 2020-07-27 15:30 +0200
        Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 15:40 +0200
          Re: SANE default scanner Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2020-07-29 00:00 +0200
  Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-07-27 19:40 +0200
    Re: SANE default scanner Siard <shiems@mailbox.org> - 2020-07-27 20:00 +0200
  Re: SANE default scanner Siard <shiems@mailbox.org> - 2020-07-27 19:40 +0200
  Re: SANE default scanner George Shuklin <george.shuklin@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 17:20 +0200
    Re: SANE default scanner Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-08-07 17:30 +0200

csiph-web