Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #224489
| From | Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed |
| Date | 2020-07-07 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ApWiB-1Op-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ApHCV-1hJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ApJlo-2nj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ApMCB-4mj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ApPK9-6f2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ApW8W-1Lg-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 09:45:56AM -0400, Gary Dale wrote: > I did install it and it is a single package. It runs fine in parallel with > the esr release. Hopefully the maintainers will continue the practice of > having firefox and firefox_esr available and bring it to Testing. You don't understand what testing *IS*! Testing is not a "rolling release". Testing is not a thing you use because it makes you cooler. Testing is not a thing you use because it has higher version numbers of packages, and the sum of all the package version numbers is your score, and having a higher score makes you win the game. Testing is not a thing you use because you're an immature child who thinks any package more than a year old is, like, TOO OLD TO BE USED BY ANYONE, like ohmygod. Testing is the NEXT STABLE RELEASE. Testing is what will become Debian 11, bullseye, in a year or two. When bullseye is stable, it will not have an unstable firefox package. When bullseye is stable, it will have firefox-esr, which is a stable package (or as close as you can get with a browser), because it is a stable release. Therefore, testing has firefox-esr. You run testing because you want to help TEST THE NEXT STABLE RELEASE, so that you can find bugs in it and report them, and get them fixed before the release. Because they sure as hell will not be fixed AFTER the release. This is your one and only chance. If you are the kind of person who MUST HAVE THE LATEST THING, then Debian is not meant for you. This includes browsers.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Firefox non-ESR update needed Gary Dale <gary@extremeground.com> - 2020-07-07 00:20 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-07-07 00:30 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Gary Dale <gary@extremeground.com> - 2020-07-07 05:30 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-07-07 10:00 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Keith bainbridge <keithrbau@gmail.com> - 2020-07-07 05:50 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Keith bainbridge <keithrbau@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 02:20 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Bob Weber <bobrweber@gmail.com> - 2020-07-07 02:10 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Gary Dale <gary@extremeground.com> - 2020-07-07 05:40 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-07-07 09:00 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Gary Dale <gary@extremeground.com> - 2020-07-07 15:50 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-07-07 16:00 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-07-07 16:10 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-07-07 16:30 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-07-08 17:20 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-07-07 17:40 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-07-07 18:10 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-07-07 18:10 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-07-07 18:40 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-07-07 19:30 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-07-07 19:40 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-07-07 19:50 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2020-07-08 23:20 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2020-07-07 18:50 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-07-07 19:30 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-07-07 21:20 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2020-07-07 21:40 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-07-07 23:30 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Gary Dale <gary@extremeground.com> - 2020-07-07 22:30 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-07-07 22:50 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-07-07 23:00 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed davidson <davidson@freevolt.org> - 2020-07-07 23:10 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed davidson <davidson@freevolt.org> - 2020-07-07 23:50 +0200
Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 07:20 +0200
csiph-web