Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #48529

Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus...

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Paul G. Derbyshire, socked up as Ko0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard,
in <news:nfg311$1249$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:

> On 23/04/2016 1:38 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:

>> Fanfic.
>> Fanfic.
>> Fanfic.

> Yours isn't very good, though. You'll never be the next E. L. Derbyshire.

You cowardly snipped out all your fanfic so you could bleat more
fanfic, Paul Derbyshire. LOL

>>>> Have you figured out yet that there are three methods of
>>>> mathematically approximating RMS voltage, Mathematical Moron? LOL

>>> When did you?

>> Long before Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. He still thinks RMS is an exact
>> number, not a mathematical approximation. Paul Derbyshire. LOL

> *You* still think it's a wave rather than just a number.

RMS represents the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate the
same amount of power as that *AC* voltage, Paul Derbyshire. Hence, RMS
voltage is still AC voltage, Paul Derbyshire, and can thus be graphed.

<http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
<http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>

SPNAK! on Paul Derbyshire.

>> Liar.

> I know I am Paul Derbyshire but what are you?

I'm the guy drop-kicking that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard
Paul G. Derbyshire across Usenet. Again. LOL

>> Water molecules on a monomolecular basis are bent geometry.
>> Water clusters form icosahedral geometries. You're basing your blather
>> off a long-disproved water model.

> VSEPR is not "long-disproved". Derbyshire. It is a very useful model.

Reading comprehension problems, Paul Derbyshire? VSEPR is not a water
model, you fecking nong. LOL

Paul G. Derbyshire thinks the Gillespie-Nyholm Theory (aka Valence
Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory) and the
Atom-Ligand-Electron Pair (AXE) method is a water model! Bwahahahaaa!

Now you backpedal with "that's not what I said.. uh, uh, I meant
something different! <diversionary bleating>", Paul Derbyshire. LOL

>> But the individual water molecule, according to the VSEPR
>> theory AXE method is bent.

> Yep, because it's like a tetrahedral jack from a game of jacks with two 
> of the pins (the lone pairs) invisible. The other two and the hub form a 
> shallow V shape.

<http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html#lp>
"Early 5-point molecular models, with explicit negative charge where
the lone pairs are purported to be, fared poorly in describing
hydrogen bonding, but more recent models show some promise. Although
there is no apparent consensus of opinion [116], such descriptions of
substantial sp3-hybridized lone pairs in the isolated water molecule
should perhaps be avoided [117], as an sp2-hybridized structure (plus
a pz orbital) is indicated."

Moron. There are no "lone pairs", it's a smeared distribution,
Derbyshire. And one doesn't describe molecular geometry based upon
electron distribution, Derbyshire, but upon the atoms making up that
molecule. You're relying upon an old and discredited water model, Paul
Derbyshire.

>>> Can you explain the 104 degree bond angle without the lone pairs, ko0ky?

>> I just did, Derbyshire moron.

> Nope. And how the shape changes when molecules are packed in cheek by 
> jowl and start squeezing each other like Paul Derbyshire squeezes his
> socks around his mushroom-slathered meatpole is a total red herring
> you keep dredging up to use as a distraction.

Bwahahahaa! Paul G. Derbyshire yet again demonstrates that he has no
fucking clue. Water molecules don't "squeeze" each other, Derbyshire.
They're constantly trying to turn gaseous, but can't because of the
inter-molecular H bonds and atmospheric water vapor partial
pressure... if one were to take away that water vapor partial
pressure, all the water on the planet would turn gaseous-phase,
Derbyshire. Liquid water on this planet is a result of gravity holding
an atmosphere to the planet, Derbyshire, and that atmosphere being
miscible with water, creating a water vapor partial pressure which
keeps most of the water liquid-phase at the predominant temperatures
seen on the planet. It's not due to any properties of the water
itself, Derbyshire.

Holy hell, Derbyshire, you get any dumber and I'll be spanking you
non-stop like last time, whereupon you'll melt down again, run away
again, get all foot-stompy again, spam AUK again, get your froth
faucet crimped shut by your NSP again, and be forced to bleat out your
butthurt from afar. Again. Lumpy Dumpy Frumpy Slumpy ShroomTard Paul
G. Derbyshire. LOL

>> Fanfic.
>> Fanfic.
>> Fanfic.
>> Fanfic.
>> Fanfic.
>> Fanfic.

You cowardly snipped out all your fanfic, Paul Derbyshire. Why are you
such a butthurt kook, Paul Derbyshire? LOL

> Why don't you write some more Derbyshire fic? You have probably not 
> been paying nearly as much attention to your ko0k Derbyshire as you
> should; he might bleat, or curse, or something if you neglect to
> bring at least a bit more steel-toed boot to his ass every few days.
> 
> *snicker*

Fanfic. LOL

>>>> Have you figured out yet what angular velocity is, Mathematical Moron?
>>>> LOL

>>> Have you?

>> Have you figured out yet that the Gaussian curvature of the universe
>> is not predominantly positive, Spankard Derbyshire? LOL

> Have you stopped beating your wife yet?

Fanfic, Paul Derbyshire. Have you stopped strangling goats and burying
them ass-up in the deep forest so you can return periodically to
molest them and harvest mushrooms from their rotting carcasses, Paul
G. Derbyshire? LOL

> I never said the universe's curvature was predominantly positive.

Liar. See below.

> It's asymptotically flat, to the best of our ability to measure. Derbyshire.
> With local pockets of positive curvature around gravitating masses.

Wrong. Yet again Paul G. Derbyshire is 180 degrees out from reality.
LOL

> Which I seem to recall having said before. Derbyshire. Clearly you
> didn't understand the Derbyshire claim at the time, and misinterpreted it.

Fucking lying backpedaling kook. You've stated many times that the
Gaussian curvature of the universe was positive, Derbyshire.

Message-ID: <70a4c67b944148a7070d3fec0f3abc17@dizum.com>
"or that gravitation results from positive curvature of the spacetime
manifold?"

Bwahahahaa! Paul Derbyshire k'lames that gravity is a result of
*positive* Gaussian curvature of the Riemannian manifold. Thus, Paul
Derbyshire believes gravity *repels*. LOL

Message-ID: <5213102e7d795603ae437dcf79b2049c@dizum.com>
"In standard general relativity, it has *no* effects (save to cause a
small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the
field)."

Bwahahahaaa! Paul G. Derbyshire k'lames that magnetism causes "*no*
effects", then backpedaled with a "save to cause a small amount of
positive curvature"... which means Derbyshire has no clue how
magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski manifold, and he denies magnetic
attraction. LOL!

Message-ID: <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com>
========================================================
>> Of course, in the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, the non-Euclidean
>> space would have positive *and* negative Gaussian curvature, and
>> therefore you'd be working with a Gaussian curvature described by -1 /
>> area^2 *and* 1 / area^2, right? After all, doesn't a 4-D Minkowski
>> space-time manifold essentially project and transform the (usually
>> roughly) spherical (elliptical geometry) objects within it to a plane
>> geometry with hyperbolic mass "points" at the intersections of the
>> principal curvatures and tangential plane to produce homeomorphic
>> isometries, Paul Derbyshire? Sure it does. Isn't that what Lobachevsky
>> discovered? Sure it is. I mean, isn't that how gravity essentially
>> works, via the metric curvature tensor isometric differential in the
>> tensor field between the curvature of a Riemannian manifold and
>> Euclidean space, as described by the geodesic deviation equation?
>> Sure it is.
>> 
>> But don't go there, that way lies you outing yourself as an
>> introductory college course-level geometry goof, Derbyshire.

> You could probably write science fiction of comparable quality to L. Ron 
> Derbyshire's output. Another career option for you is laughter therapist 
> for Stephen Derbyshire, because what you just wrote is a howler.

LunkHead admits he doesn't understand the reality of what I wrote,
which means there's no way in hell he's an astrophysicist. Way to out
yourself, ShroomTard Derbyshire. LOL!

Lunkhead Derbyshire didn't even know that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept is the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity, the modern theory of gravity, and that the curvature of
spacetime is described by the geodesic deviation equation!

Lunkhead Derbyshire admits he has no clue how space-time is warped by
mass!

What a moron! Derbyshire's no astrophysicist, he's just a poseur,
pretending that he's smarter than he really is. In reality, he's a
fucking idiot.

<snicker>
========================================================

Message-ID: <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com>
"Curvature varies from place to place, and in this universe is mostly
positive (small areas where it's negative can be produced via means
like the Casimir effect)."

Bwahahaa! Paul G. Derbyshire yet again k'lames the Gaussian curvature
of the universe is "mostly positive", meaning he thinks planets ride
above the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold,
thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian
curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Derbyshire also
demonstrates that he has no fucking clue what the Casimir Effect is
nor how it affects 4-D spacetime. LOL

Hey, where are you going, Paul G. Derbyshire? Are you going to run
away from your stupidity? Again? LOL

>>>> Have you figured out yet that a sinusoid is a transform of a circle,
>>>> Mathematical Moron? LOL

>>> So you're backing off from k'laming that it's a *Fourier* transform of a
>>> circle?

>> Pedantic fanfic.

> I'll take that as a "yes".

I'll take that as a "Paul G. Derbyshire is a bleatfarting fanficcing
moron". LOL

> SPNAK! scored by Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder entered into official record.

<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
See the animations about 1/4th down the page, Derbyshire? Yeah, those
are Fourier transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real
time. LOL

>>>> Have you figured out yet what the difference is between frequency and
>>>> period of a sinewave, Mathematical Moron?

>>> Have you? 'Twasn't that long ago you thought a certain periodic signal
>>> would have a period of eight zillion or so when the correct answer was one.
>>>
>>> *sn<SMACKAMORON!>

>> Wrong.

> I *just* posted that SPNAK, complete with link to and quote from the 
> article where you fucked that up so badly. Go fetch, ko0ky.

Paul G. Derbyshire is a lying backpedaling kook. LOL

> *sn<SMACKAMORON!>

<snicker>

>> Fanfic.
>> Fanfic.
>> Fanfic.
>> Fanfic.
>> Fanfic.

You cowardly snipped out all your butthurt fanfic, Paul Derbyshire.
Are you embarrassed to be such a butthurt moron, Derbyshire? Is that
why you ran away from AUK, then came back to spam it, got your
frothnozzle crimped shut by AIOE, and now you're forced to bleatscream
out your butthurt from afar? LOL

> Bleat<SMACKAMORON!>

<snicker>

>>>> a lying backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering moron.

>>> Oh, don't be so hard on yourself.
>>>
>>> But this long, concentrated litany of all your recent backpedals

>> You mean everything I was right about and Shiny Tinfoil Spankard
>> demonstrated his moronism about? Yet again, Paul Derbyshire is 180
>> degrees out from reality... my .sig is chock-a-block full of such
>> instances from Paul 'Lumpy Dumpy Frumpy Slumpy ShroomTard' Derbyshire.
>> LOL

> That's a start, but it's only an opening paragraph. If you want to be 
> the E. L. James of Derbyshire fanfic you'll need to up your writing 
> volume significantly.

Fanfic. LOL

>>> suggests to me that Sn!pe could use some competition for that Lance
>>> Derbyshire Trophy. Consider yourself entered into the race as his
>>> competitor. Whoever can go backwards the most vigorously during what
>>> remains of the month of April, wins, for fuck's sake.
>>>
>>> *sni<SMACKAMORON!>

>> Awww, poor Paul Derbyshire... he's so butthurt he's sticking up
>> for Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, and that spankard is the most-spanked
>> spankard in the history of Usenet... but Paul Derbyshire's a close
>> second.

> That's two paragraphs. Still, barely a start.

Fanfic. LOL

>> Go on, Paul Derbyshire... hand out more of your 'awards from a
>> kook'... show the world just how butthurt I've made you.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul G.
>> Derbyshire<MUSHROOM CLOUD>

> Aww, no, you can't just keep copy-pasting the same old shopworn bit of 
> Derbyshire fanfic. You have to write *all new, original material* or 
> the g0d of the g00fs to which you've devoted yourself might curse you or 
> smite you or something.
> 
> *snicker*

The truth is what the truth is, Paul Derbyshire. Why can't you refute
that truth, Paul Derbyshire? Why did you backpedal and try to k'lame
you and Nadegda were 'vacationing' in Pembroke and you definitely
*weren't* there to ride Paul Derbyshire's mushroom slathered meatpole,
Paul Derbyshire? Does Paul Derbyshire make his bitchsocks bleat like
goats as he faps with them, Paul Derbyshire? LOL

Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul G.
Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada by Ray Banana. When Kensi D.
LunkHead learned of this, he immediately started backpedaling and
k'laming that "Nadegda" was actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke.
LOL!

Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ>

X-Received: by 10.224.215.194 with SMTP id
hf2mr20447108qab.0.1367629316993;
        Fri, 03 May 2013 18:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Path:
y6ni5923qax.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.bbs-scene.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED.67.70.58.178!not-for-mail
From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at
this
 Usenet thing?
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me>
References: <klmos0$ma7$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<klpdue$ij8$1@news.albasani.net> <p6cgt.2690$hl7.1582@newsfe14.iad>
	<klsfqm$vnt$5@dont-email.me> <klskpp$uv9$1@dont-email.me>
	<x4ogt.36755$zt4.25500@newsfe15.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="67.70.58.178";
	logging-data="29843";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"
Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock
puppets
Keywords: Murphy
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5876
Lines: 116
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
========================================================
========================================================

Adding the Injection-Info: header into an E-S post gets it rejected.
Go on, Paul, do it again, if you claim to be able to do it at will.

Make it exactly this:
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="1.1.1.1";
	logging-data="29843";

Well, Paul? We're waiting. <tap, tap, tap> Nothing, Paul?

<snicker>

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul G. Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada is a life-long virgin,
you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a
Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's
hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle.
Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in
the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so
deeply it pokes out of her mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-22 06:42 +0200
  Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-22 08:38 -0400
    Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-23 07:38 +0200
      Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-23 11:06 -0400
        Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... wod@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Wader of Doom) - 2016-04-23 18:03 +0100
        Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-24 07:04 +0200
          Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-23 22:52 -0700
            Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-04-24 17:34 -0400
              Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-24 22:33 +0000
              Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-24 17:47 -0700
                Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-04-24 20:53 -0400
              Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-25 07:36 +0200
            Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-25 07:03 +0200
              Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Skeet DoW #8 <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-25 01:20 -0600
          Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-24 18:41 +0000
            Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-24 14:48 -0400
            Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-25 07:52 +0200
              Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-25 11:59 -0400
                Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-26 06:38 +0200
                Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-26 05:06 +0000
                Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-26 12:23 -0400
                Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-26 21:21 +0000
                Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-27 08:13 +0200
  Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-23 08:48 +0200
    Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-23 11:07 -0400
      Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-23 17:45 +0000

csiph-web