Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: lcc-win |
| Date | 2011-08-12 11:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <87liuyv4wf.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <fb3f7063-8b9f-4a31-b14b-93c9d6d43567@z7g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <4E456A5A.7030107@verizon.net> <08ca0d9c-2dd2-425f-b779-75611ca3a85e@a27g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <87pqkav5nd.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> <53daa922-8cd8-433f-8227-a26de6f562d0@dc3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> writes: > On Aug 12, 2:36 pm, b...@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) wrote: >> tom st denis <t...@iahu.ca> writes: >> >> > I mean Jacob comes up with his own "standard" for errors/warnings and >> > documents that. Joking aside, that actually might be helpful to the >> > industry. Imagine if Solaris CC, GCC, CLANG, etc all produced >> > identical text for errors/warnings. That'd be plenty darn handy. >> >> It would be? What would it be handy for? > > For starters, it'd make people trying to debug syntax errors not have > to learn the idiosyncrasies of their compiler. It'd mean in theory > they could post them to clc without getting an OT banhammer, etc... Hmm. The former might be useful. I don't think the latter makes much sense; it would be unusual for someone to post a compiler error message to comp.lang.c, along with some code, and have anyone complain that the error message by itself made the article off-topic. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 15:14 +0200
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-11 07:51 -0700
Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-11 11:23 -0400
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-11 08:35 -0700
Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-11 12:28 -0400
Re: lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-11 11:46 -0700
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 10:20 -0700
Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-12 14:00 -0400
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 11:23 -0700
Re: lcc-win blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-08-12 11:36 -0700
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 11:42 -0700
Re: lcc-win Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-08-12 11:52 -0700
Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-12 20:37 +0200
Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 19:45 +0200
Re: lcc-win Ralf Damaschke <rwspam@gmx.de> - 2011-08-11 20:12 +0000
Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 22:43 +0200
Re: lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-11 13:43 -0700
Re: lcc-win Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-12 08:50 +1200
Re: lcc-win gordonb.04sy5@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-08-12 19:54 -0500
csiph-web