Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #430962
| From | John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats |
| Date | 2016-10-12 08:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <874m4iujlo.fsf@devereux.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <e64c30F45beU1@mid.individual.net> <vu6dnavEz98RYWHKnZ2dnUU7-fvNnZ2d@supernews.com> <v28qvbhfd6hmfus9esvniga494drps0qdj@4ax.com> <878ttuvjav.fsf@devereux.me.uk> <e2iqvb5fblma32h5b1qimbg4knpo6577t2@4ax.com> |
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> writes: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:20:56 +0100, John Devereux > <john@devereux.me.uk> wrote: > >>Hey Jeff, any similar recommendation for aftermarket workhorse color >>laser printers? I have a very old HP 4500DN we use for printing manuals >>(and general use). Even genuine consumables are dirt cheap on ebay since >>everyone is throwing them out. But it is slow and big and heavy, and can >>have feed problems with our "silk" finish paper. > > About a week ago, I tore down and refurbished a pair of HP 45500DN > printers for a local appraiser. He also uses them for reports. 150K > and 200K pages each. He wants to keep the printers going hopefully > forever because of the low cost of ownership and reliability. He > claims he can start a large print job, and go off to do something > else, and know that it will be done without any problems. > > However, the problem that precipitated a rebuild was not the usual > worn rubber parts or cleaning. Despite my repeated warnings, he > purchased some genuine HP "old stock" toner carts. However, there's a > problem. Everything on eBay is "genuine" HP "old stock" which means > they're old carts with an uncertain history. Caveat emptor. I'm not > sure exactly what went wrong, but after about 100 color pages, the > prints started to look awful with toner splattered everywhere. Oh yes I've had something similar happen, a lot of the "genuine" stock is indeed old. It's not too much trouble to swap out the guilty consumable. > My guess(tm) is the rubber scrubber blades inside the toner carts had > age hardened and were not removing excess toner from the drums. Lots > of cleaning, some pre-emptive rubber parts replacements, and different > set of carts, and both printers now work normally. > > 4500/4550 parts and pieces. > <http://www.printerworks.com/Top-LaserJet-Parts-PrinterWorks/CLJ-4500-Printer-Parts.html> Thanks! > Sorry, but I'm not going to recommend any printer I haven't sold, > setup, played with, repaired, dissected, or otherwise had some > experience using. OK, understood. > Most of the stuff I have in the office are older > home color laser printers, all of which have some type of limitation > of chronic problem. If you're really using it as a printing press, I > would avoid all the low end printers. They just don't last. Same for > Brother, where the low end product are ummm... low end. The 4500DN was pretty "high end" when we bought it, ~$7000 in USian! last time I looked they were basically free here now, as long as you don't need it shipped... I guess we'll keep using it. > Incidentally, I picked up a semi-dead Brother (model number forgotten) > color laser printer for $40 from a local recycler. I then burned > about 15 hrs and $40 in parts, and it still dumps blue toner. Fixing > b&w laser printers is fairly simple, but color seems is far more > complex. > > Also, if you want cheap Brother printers, look for the "refurbished" > printers on Staples web pile: > <http://www.staples.com/refurbished+brother+color+laser+printer/directory_refurbished%2520brother%2520color%2520laser%2520printer> > They're about half the price of a new printer and seem to be new in > the box on arrival. Other than one printer with shipping damage, no > problems. -- John Devereux
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Brother International is a bunch of asshats Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-11 10:31 -0400
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2016-10-11 07:42 -0700
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-11 10:51 -0400
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Baron <baron@linuxmaniac.net> - 2016-10-11 17:05 +0100
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2016-10-11 09:19 -0700
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2016-10-11 20:56 -0800
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats "P E Schoen" <paul@pstech-inc.com> - 2016-10-12 04:30 -0400
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2016-10-12 08:13 -0500
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-11 10:43 -0700
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2016-10-11 19:20 +0100
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-11 13:50 -0700
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-10-11 17:01 -0500
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2016-10-12 08:12 +0100
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats jurb6006@gmail.com - 2016-10-11 11:22 -0700
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-11 14:11 -0700
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-10-11 09:02 -0700
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Bill Martin <wwm@wwmartin.net> - 2016-10-11 09:50 -0700
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2016-10-11 14:14 -0500
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-11 14:26 -0700
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2016-10-11 18:14 +0200
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-11 10:10 -0700
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-11 13:50 -0400
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-11 14:28 -0400
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-11 14:22 -0400
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Ecnerwal <MyNameForward@ReplaceWithMyVices.Com.invalid> - 2016-10-11 16:52 -0400
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-11 17:55 -0700
Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-12 12:42 -0700
csiph-web