Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #430866

Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats

From Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Subject Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats
Date 2016-10-11 07:42 -0700
Message-ID <e64c30F45beU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <Tv6dnT87d8M0amHKnZ2dnUU7-U_NnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2016-10-11 07:31, Phil Hobbs wrote:
> So my trusty Brother MFC6490CW B-size all-in-one printer died the death.
>   Looks like an encoder failure on the paper feed.
>
> It was one of their last ones that didn't have chips in the ink
> cartridges, and it worked great for years.  One of the better three
> bills I ever spent.
>
> The replacement, an MFCJ series model, pretends to print with
> aftermarket ink but doesn't really.  When you run the head cleaning
> routine, only about 10% of the black ink pattern prints, and repeated
> cleaning doesn't make that any better.
>
> There's nothing wrong with the ink or the print head--it's deliberately
> crippled.
>
> I know this from two lines of evidence:
>
> 1. When you hold two test prints up to the sunlight superimposed, you
> see that it's a different set of spots that prints each time, and especially
>
> 2. It prints the machine serial number on the test print, in black, and
> it comes out _perfectly_.
>
> Asshats.
>
> I'm never buying another Brother product.
>
> However, I do need a light-duty B-size (11x17) colour printer.  Budget
> is probably $1k or thereabouts.  Anybody got one that they like?
>

No, but regarding brands this is my experience: I had a Brother MFC 
(monochrome Laser all-in-one) and it was ok for several years, even with 
aftermarket toner. Eventually numerous paper jams ensued and eventually 
the electronics hung it up.

I replaced it with a Canon ImageClass unit and the difference was day 
and night. Nice and sound mechanical clicking and clacking noises 
instead of creaking noises, never a paper jam. Might be worth checking 
out a Canon product that suits your 11*17 requirement and other.

One thing that IMO goes in favor of Brother: Their software was much 
better than Canon's. Software architecture seems not to be Canon's strength.

HP: Their stuff always held up remarkably well. Even the old low-cost 
HP-5L still works and it's almost 20 years now.

-- 
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Brother International is a bunch of asshats Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-11 10:31 -0400
  Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2016-10-11 07:42 -0700
    Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-11 10:51 -0400
      Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Baron <baron@linuxmaniac.net> - 2016-10-11 17:05 +0100
      Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2016-10-11 09:19 -0700
        Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2016-10-11 20:56 -0800
        Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats "P E Schoen" <paul@pstech-inc.com> - 2016-10-12 04:30 -0400
          Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2016-10-12 08:13 -0500
      Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-11 10:43 -0700
        Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2016-10-11 19:20 +0100
          Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-11 13:50 -0700
            Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-10-11 17:01 -0500
            Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2016-10-12 08:12 +0100
        Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats jurb6006@gmail.com - 2016-10-11 11:22 -0700
          Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-11 14:11 -0700
  Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-10-11 09:02 -0700
    Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Bill Martin <wwm@wwmartin.net> - 2016-10-11 09:50 -0700
    Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2016-10-11 14:14 -0500
    Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-11 14:26 -0700
  Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2016-10-11 18:14 +0200
  Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-11 10:10 -0700
    Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-11 13:50 -0400
      Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-11 14:28 -0400
    Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-11 14:22 -0400
  Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Ecnerwal <MyNameForward@ReplaceWithMyVices.Com.invalid> - 2016-10-11 16:52 -0400
  Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-11 17:55 -0700
    Re: Brother International is a bunch of asshats Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-12 12:42 -0700

csiph-web