Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll

From	Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll
Date	2021-03-11 17:56 -0300
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<861rclz9x0.fsf@example.com> (permalink)
References	<86blbt7e82.fsf@example.com> <rfqnroak5rh5.j3rmmhqxfpk8$.dlg@40tude.net>

Show all headers | View raw

JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> writes:

[...]

> You could use the 32-bit version of Rash as well as Racket if Rash's 
> functionality is crucial, or if it'll be used for something which requires 
> more than 3GB of memory.

(I didn't get the comment on the 3GB-memory.  I thought that maybe
32-bit would let me use less memory, but I'm not sure what the limit
is.)

That's another interesting idea.  I can install a 32-bit of Racket and
then install Rash.  I wouldn't mind running a 32-bit Rash at all.  I can
even delete Racket 32-bit after building Rash.  The installation is easy:

  https://mirror.racket-lang.org/installers/8.0/racket-8.0-i386-win32-bc.exe

I'll report back what happened.

By the way, I thought Racket was supposed to come with a ``libedit.dll''
(with this or similar name), but at least on the recent versions for
Windows, it does not.

Thank you all for such great assistance.

You guys keep the USENET spirit alive.  That's priceless.

Thread

on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-08 14:22 -0300
  Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-08 20:03 +0100
    Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2021-03-09 14:17 +0700
      Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-11 17:50 -0300
    Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-11 17:48 -0300
  Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-03-08 14:16 -0500
    Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-11 17:52 -0300
  Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2021-03-09 14:45 +0700
    Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-11 17:56 -0300
      Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-12 09:00 -0300
      Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2021-03-12 20:51 +0700
        Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-16 14:42 -0300
          Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Härra Ramob <ya12983@mail.com> - 2022-01-05 00:36 -0800

csiph-web