Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!a5sR6gGxMfQtxJQ7Hv6f/A.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Boris Dorestand Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:56:43 -0300 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 27 Message-ID: <861rclz9x0.fsf@example.com> References: <86blbt7e82.fsf@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: a5sR6gGxMfQtxJQ7Hv6f/A.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:qHKAGK+LQVDA1H4m+BZ0pP5wPwA= Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:12326 JJ writes: [...] > You could use the 32-bit version of Rash as well as Racket if Rash's > functionality is crucial, or if it'll be used for something which requires > more than 3GB of memory. (I didn't get the comment on the 3GB-memory. I thought that maybe 32-bit would let me use less memory, but I'm not sure what the limit is.) That's another interesting idea. I can install a 32-bit of Racket and then install Rash. I wouldn't mind running a 32-bit Rash at all. I can even delete Racket 32-bit after building Rash. The installation is easy: https://mirror.racket-lang.org/installers/8.0/racket-8.0-i386-win32-bc.exe I'll report back what happened. By the way, I thought Racket was supposed to come with a ``libedit.dll'' (with this or similar name), but at least on the recent versions for Windows, it does not. Thank you all for such great assistance. You guys keep the USENET spirit alive. That's priceless.