Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #12347
| From | Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll |
| Date | 2021-03-16 14:42 -0300 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <86a6r35728.fsf@example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <86blbt7e82.fsf@example.com> <rfqnroak5rh5.j3rmmhqxfpk8$.dlg@40tude.net> <861rclz9x0.fsf@example.com> <1h5gnvg6o7oop.3jqhf9lmybr4$.dlg@40tude.net> |
JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:56:43 -0300, Boris Dorestand wrote: >> JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> writes: >> >> [...] >> >>> You could use the 32-bit version of Rash as well as Racket if Rash's >>> functionality is crucial, or if it'll be used for something which requires >>> more than 3GB of memory. >> >> (I didn't get the comment on the 3GB-memory. I thought that maybe >> 32-bit would let me use less memory, but I'm not sure what the limit >> is.) > > Sorry for the confusion, that's supposed to be: > > .. or if it'll be used for something which _DOES NOT_ require more than 3GB > of memory. Thanks! That makes sense now!
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-08 14:22 -0300
Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-08 20:03 +0100
Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2021-03-09 14:17 +0700
Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-11 17:50 -0300
Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-11 17:48 -0300
Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-03-08 14:16 -0500
Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-11 17:52 -0300
Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2021-03-09 14:45 +0700
Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-11 17:56 -0300
Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-12 09:00 -0300
Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2021-03-12 20:51 +0700
Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com> - 2021-03-16 14:42 -0300
Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll Härra Ramob <ya12983@mail.com> - 2022-01-05 00:36 -0800
csiph-web