Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > misc.phone.mobile.iphone > #76427
| Subject | Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android |
| References | (8 earlier) <250720152045033422%nospam@nospam.invalid> <mp552d$1a7$1@news.sap-ag.de> <270720151733090421%nospam@nospam.invalid> <d1q70rFqpn2U1@mid.individual.net> <mpa0hi$dpu$1@news.sap-ag.de> |
| From | madodel ptd News <madodel@ptd.net> |
| Date | 2015-07-29 13:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <7_WdnReRI-gGjiTInZ2dnUU7-LOdnZ2d@ptd.net> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 7/29/15 3:49 AM, Michael Eyd wrote: > Am 28.07.2015 um 22:29 schrieb Frank Slootweg: >> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> In article <mp552d$1a7$1@news.sap-ag.de>, Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> >>> wrote: >> [...] >>>> Because (almost everywhere in the world) they do know upfront what type >>>> of line they're calling. >>> >>> which puts mobile users at a disadvantage. >> >> You keep on kicking this dead horse, despite repeatedly being told >> that such 'disadvantage' *does not exist* for the *majority* of people >> in the *majority* of countries. >> >> I already told you several times - and you ignored it, and *silently* >> snipped it, every time [1] - that for example in my country - The >> Netherlands - there *is no* defacto rate differentiation between >> fixed-to-fixed and fixed-to-mobile. >> >> Since your major 'opponent' (read: the one who's still bothering) is >> Michael Eyd, it would be interesting to hear what the situation in >> Germany is. >> >> I.e. if a German customer gets a standard fixed phone subscription, >> does (s)he get a rate difference between fixed-to-fixed and >> fixed-to-mobile? > > Yes, calls to mobile are (if not covered by an so-called all-net flatrate) > are more expensive than to fixed-line numbers. The price difference > decreased considerably over the years, but is still there... Take e.g. the > cheapest plans T-Com (our former monopolist) offers: For 19€/month you > don't get any free calls, but pay for calls to fixed-line numbers > 2.9ct/min, while calls to any of the German mobile networks (no > differentiation there anymore) you pay 19ct/min (all prices are Euros, not > US-$). Obviously, you can get on-top flatrates for fixed-line numbers, for > mobile numbers, for international calls, ..., but all of that is extra. > >> With "standard", I mean the most common subscription. I.e. I'm not >> interested in special subscription where customers can get rate >> differentiation if they *want* it, but what they get if I just order the >> most common subscription. > > These days in Germany (for new fixed-line contracts) many people choose a > plan where (national) fixed-line calls are flat, but calls to mobile > numbers go extra - unless people know that they'll be calling someone's > mobile rather often. And in that case (many) people start considering doing > such calls from their mobile, rather than from the fixed-line phone - as it > might be cheaper. > > Best regards, > > Michael Here in the US many are doing away with landlines. Here I mostly get junk calls on the landline I have. I rarely use it any more to make phone calls. We keep it mostly because of inertia and as a backup in case cell service goes out (which has happened a couple times because of storms). Mark
Back to misc.phone.mobile.iphone | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-22 20:22 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-22 18:54 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 10:20 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 14:16 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-23 01:08 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 15:18 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 10:11 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-23 18:46 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-25 20:45 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 14:14 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-27 17:33 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 08:41 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-28 10:36 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-28 20:29 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? madodel ptd News <madodel@ptd.net> - 2015-07-29 13:55 -0400
csiph-web