Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #21096

Re: Multiple image preload construct?

Message-ID <7182976.Ku1byVuyr4@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date 2013-08-29 15:16 +0200
Subject Re: Multiple image preload construct?
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
References (1 earlier) <kvire7$ca3$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2725916.yAnYnyUf7L@PointedEars.de> <kvj576$9oj$2@dont-email.me> <2920459.yuR5o6d9W1@PointedEars.de> <kvm9oa$nja$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Cezary Tomczyk wrote:

> On 2013-08-28 01:27, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Cezary Tomczyk wrote:
>>> On 2013-08-27 23:02, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> Ken wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> Now you can call the function:
>>>>>
>>>>>        loadImages(myArray, loadDone);
>>>>>
>>>>>        function loadDone(result)  {
>>>>>            console.log('All images loaded!');
>>>>>            /// result contains an array with the Image elements
>>>>>        }
>>>>
>>>> Function expressions are widely supported by now, especially where
>>>> console.log() is supported [1]:
>>>>
>>>>     loadImages(myArray, function (result) {
>>>>       console.log('All images loaded!');
>>>>       /* result contains an array with the Image elements */
>>>>     });
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> While function expressions support is fine now then passing as a
>>> parameter in the "loadImages" function with long code can make whole
>>> "loadImages" later harder to maintenance.
>>
>> (_maintain_)  True.  OTOH, functions/methods should not be long.
> 
> Exactly what I meant.

I do not think so.  You have argued that using function expressions in 
function calls can pose a readability issue because functions can be long.  
I have argued that functions/methods should not be long in the first place 
(but larger pieces should be moved into separate functions/methods, which 
are then called in the original function/method).  So the problem you see is 
not supposed to exist in well-written code in the first place.

> Regarding "_maintain_" - thanks.

You're welcome.
 
-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Multiple image preload construct? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2013-08-27 16:32 +0200
  Re: Multiple image preload construct? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2013-08-27 17:06 +0200
  Re: Multiple image preload construct? Danny <dann90038@gmail.com> - 2013-08-27 10:29 -0700
  Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 13:32 -0500
    Re: Multiple image preload construct? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2013-08-27 20:54 +0200
      Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 18:19 -0500
        Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 01:37 +0200
          Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 18:47 -0500
    Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-27 23:02 +0200
      Re: Multiple image preload construct? Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2013-08-27 23:20 +0200
        Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 01:27 +0200
          Re: Multiple image preload construct? Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2013-08-29 03:56 +0200
            Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-29 15:16 +0200
      Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 18:43 -0500
        Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 02:08 +0200
          Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 19:49 -0500
            Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 03:17 +0200
              Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 20:35 -0500
                Re: Multiple image preload construct? Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-29 19:32 +0100
              Re: Multiple image preload construct? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-28 16:20 +0100
            Re: Multiple image preload construct? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-28 11:21 +1000
              Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 20:48 -0500
                Re: Multiple image preload construct? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-28 13:43 +1000
                Re: Multiple image preload construct? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-29 10:00 +0100
                Re: Multiple image preload construct? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-30 07:25 +1000
                Re: Multiple image preload construct? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-30 10:11 +0100
        Re: Multiple image preload construct? Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-28 02:17 +0200
          Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 02:38 +0200
      Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 11:04 +0200
      Re: Multiple image preload construct? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-28 16:26 +0100

csiph-web