Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #21092
| From | Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Multiple image preload construct? |
| Date | 2013-08-29 03:56 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kvm9oa$nja$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <kvidas$lib$1@news.albasani.net> <kvire7$ca3$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2725916.yAnYnyUf7L@PointedEars.de> <kvj576$9oj$2@dont-email.me> <2920459.yuR5o6d9W1@PointedEars.de> |
On 2013-08-28 01:27, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Cezary Tomczyk wrote:
>
>> On 2013-08-27 23:02, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> Ken wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> Now you can call the function:
>>>>
>>>> loadImages(myArray, loadDone);
>>>>
>>>> function loadDone(result) {
>>>> console.log('All images loaded!');
>>>> /// result contains an array with the Image elements
>>>> }
>>>
>>> Function expressions are widely supported by now, especially where
>>> console.log() is supported [1]:
>>>
>>> loadImages(myArray, function (result) {
>>> console.log('All images loaded!');
>>> /* result contains an array with the Image elements */
>>> });
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> While function expressions support is fine now then passing as a
>> parameter in the "loadImages" function with long code can make whole
>> "loadImages" later harder to maintenance.
>
> (_maintain_) True. OTOH, functions/methods should not be long.
Exactly what I meant. Regarding "_maintain_" - thanks.
>> It could be even worst if more parameters will be added to "loadImages".
>>
>> But that's my opinion.
>
> I have been using the following code styles (in no particular order):
>
> A)
>
> loadImages(myArray, function (result) {
> console.log('All images loaded!');
> /* result contains an array with the Image elements */
> });
>
> B)
>
> loadImages(myArray,
> function (result) {
> console.log('All images loaded!');
> /* result contains an array with the Image elements */
> });
>
> C)
>
> loadImages(
> myArray,
> function (result) {
> console.log('All images loaded!');
> /* result contains an array with the Image elements */
> },
> foo);
>
> D)
>
> loadImages(
> myArray,
> function (result) {
> console.log('All images loaded!');
> /* result contains an array with the Image elements */
> },
> foo
> );
>
> But I can see how using a property reference can be of advantage.
:-)
--
Cezary Tomczyk
http://www.ctomczyk.pl/
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Multiple image preload construct? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2013-08-27 16:32 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2013-08-27 17:06 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Danny <dann90038@gmail.com> - 2013-08-27 10:29 -0700
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 13:32 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2013-08-27 20:54 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 18:19 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 01:37 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 18:47 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-27 23:02 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2013-08-27 23:20 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 01:27 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2013-08-29 03:56 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-29 15:16 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 18:43 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 02:08 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 19:49 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 03:17 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 20:35 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-29 19:32 +0100
Re: Multiple image preload construct? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-28 16:20 +0100
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-28 11:21 +1000
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 20:48 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-28 13:43 +1000
Re: Multiple image preload construct? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-29 10:00 +0100
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-30 07:25 +1000
Re: Multiple image preload construct? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-30 10:11 +0100
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-28 02:17 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 02:38 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 11:04 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-28 16:26 +0100
csiph-web