Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671380
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Technical details |
| Date | 2026-07-05 10:26 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <6A4A93BD.5E56@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <1123iiu$219ku$1@dont-email.me> <nap39uFgdj2U1@mid.individual.net> <6A495D4A.1A88@ix.netcom.com> <6A49603F.1308@ix.netcom.com> <6A4A8DEF.7F53@ix.netcom.com> |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > Am Mittwoch000001, 01.07.2026 um 19:33 schrieb Paul B. Andersen: > > > > > Den 29.06.2026 11:05, skrev Maciej Woźniak: > > > > >> Well, I'm an engineer. > > > > > > > > > > Then you know that "time" is what we measure with clocks. > > > > > > > > that's nonsense, since 'is' (in the statement above) means: > > > > > > > > the 'thing' we call 'time' would depend on clocks. > > > > > > > > But that is absolutely untrue. > > > > > > > > That would be equivalent to: > > > > 'the quantity length' would depend on yardsticks. > > > > > > > > Instead: > > > > we have something that we call 'time', which can be measured with clocks > > > > (and other devices). But time does not depend on clocks (because clocks > > > > are man-made device), but is created as a feature of nature. > > > > > > > > Our aim is now NOT the measurement of time, but to find out, why and how > > > > nature is able to maintain this feature > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > TH > > > > > > 'In the beginning, ...' > > > > > > Nature > > > is able > > > to maintain > > > this feature.. > > > from the very beginning. > > > > > > The Sun > > > The Moon > > > > > > 'In the beginning, ...The Time. > > > > > > The Heavens > > > The Earth > > > > > > I'll explain the very Nature of it.. > > > > > > First, a location..with boundaries > > > > > > add a little Time > > > > > > and Volia! > > > > > > a stinky planet > > > with stinky girls > > > > > > WHAT'S DAT SMELL??? > > > > > > > > > you pee out of dat thing???? > > > > > > Wait a minute, i lost track, where was i? > > > > > > 'In the beginning, ...' > > > > > > you maintain this feature > > > by clockwise and counter clockwise > > > Heavens and the Earth. > > > > > > Now, where is the mechanism that makes the earth go round...? > > > > > > Who is winding the clock? > > > > > > No, not who...What. > > > > > > What's on second. > > > > Oh, I forgot One Technical detail... > > > > God. > > > > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' > > > > God is...pre-big bang > > > > God is proto-universe. > > > > What is REAL stupid is to watch the 'science community' say "There is no > God.", then they ask > > "Where did the heavens and the earth come from?" > > Then they say..."Nothing!!!!" > > There is no end to the stupidity of the 'scienctific community'. > > They simply reached their level of incompentance. Of course, if you remove the word God from this sentence: 'In the beginning, created the heavens and the earth.' What do you see between the words "beginning" "created"....nothing. It is very simple to take: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' and simply look at it from a 'scientific point-of-view' of the 'order of events'. 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' The 'order of events' you have a proto-universe pre-big bang First 'order of events' is the word... "'In..." Volumes can be written on that word alone. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-06-29 11:05 +0200
Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-01 19:33 +0200
Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-01 21:56 +0200
Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 13:09 +0200
Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 14:11 +0200
Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 15:23 +0200
Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 15:56 +0200
Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 18:57 +0200
Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 19:10 +0200
Re: Technical details Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-03 08:31 +0200
Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-03 10:21 +0200
Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 12:21 -0700
Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 12:34 -0700
Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-05 10:26 -0700
Re: Technical details "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-05 14:11 -0700
Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-05 15:44 -0700
Re: Technical details Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-05 06:32 +0200
Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 23:54 -0700
Re: Technical details Buddie Balagurov <bdbi@vdvr.ru> - 2026-07-06 20:28 +0000
csiph-web