Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671380

Re: Technical details

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Technical details
Date 2026-07-05 10:26 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <6A4A93BD.5E56@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <1123iiu$219ku$1@dont-email.me> <nap39uFgdj2U1@mid.individual.net> <6A495D4A.1A88@ix.netcom.com> <6A49603F.1308@ix.netcom.com> <6A4A8DEF.7F53@ix.netcom.com>

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Am Mittwoch000001, 01.07.2026 um 19:33 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
> > > > > Den 29.06.2026 11:05, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
> > > > >> Well, I'm an engineer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then you know that "time" is what we measure with clocks.
> > > >
> > > > that's nonsense, since 'is' (in the statement above) means:
> > > >
> > > > the 'thing' we call 'time' would depend on clocks.
> > > >
> > > > But that is absolutely untrue.
> > > >
> > > > That would be equivalent to:
> > > > 'the quantity length' would depend on yardsticks.
> > > >
> > > > Instead:
> > > > we have something that we call 'time', which can be measured with clocks
> > > > (and other devices). But time does not depend on clocks (because clocks
> > > > are man-made device), but is created as a feature of nature.
> > > >
> > > > Our aim is now NOT the measurement of time, but to find out, why and how
> > > > nature is able to maintain this feature
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > TH
> > >
> > > 'In the beginning, ...'
> > >
> > > Nature
> > > is able
> > > to maintain
> > > this feature..
> > > from the very beginning.
> > >
> > > The Sun
> > > The Moon
> > >
> > > 'In the beginning, ...The Time.
> > >
> > > The Heavens
> > > The Earth
> > >
> > > I'll explain the very Nature of it..
> > >
> > > First, a location..with boundaries
> > >
> > > add a little Time
> > >
> > > and Volia!
> > >
> > > a stinky planet
> > > with stinky girls
> > >
> > > WHAT'S DAT SMELL???
> > >
> > >
> > > you pee out of dat thing????
> > >
> > > Wait a minute, i lost track, where was i?
> > >
> > > 'In the beginning, ...'
> > >
> > > you maintain this feature
> > > by clockwise and counter clockwise
> > > Heavens and the Earth.
> > >
> > > Now, where is the mechanism that makes the earth go round...?
> > >
> > > Who is winding the clock?
> > >
> > > No, not who...What.
> > >
> > > What's on second.
> >
> > Oh, I forgot One Technical detail...
> >
> > God.
> >
> > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'
> >
> > God is...pre-big bang
> >
> > God is proto-universe.
> >
> 
> What is REAL stupid is to watch the 'science community' say "There is no
> God.", then they ask
> 
> "Where did the heavens and the earth come from?"
> 
> Then they say..."Nothing!!!!"
> 
> There is no end to the stupidity of the 'scienctific community'.
> 
> They simply reached their level of incompentance.

Of course, if you remove the word God from this sentence: 

'In the beginning,                   created the heavens and the earth.'


What do you see between the words "beginning"  "created"....nothing.


It is very simple to take: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens
and the earth.'

and simply look at it from a 'scientific point-of-view' of the 'order of
events'.


'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'


'In the beginning, 
God 
created 
the heavens and the earth.'

The 'order of events'
you have a
proto-universe
pre-big bang

First 'order of events' is the word...

"'In..."


Volumes can be written on that word alone.










-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-06-29 11:05 +0200
  Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-01 19:33 +0200
    Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-01 21:56 +0200
      Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 13:09 +0200
        Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 14:11 +0200
          Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 15:23 +0200
            Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 15:56 +0200
              Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 18:57 +0200
                Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 19:10 +0200
    Re: Technical details Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-03 08:31 +0200
      Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-03 10:21 +0200
      Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 12:21 -0700
        Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 12:34 -0700
          Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-05 10:01 -0700
            Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-05 10:26 -0700
            Re: Technical details "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-05 14:11 -0700
              Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-05 15:44 -0700
        Re: Technical details Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-05 06:32 +0200
          Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 23:54 -0700
          Re: Technical details Buddie Balagurov <bdbi@vdvr.ru> - 2026-07-06 20:28 +0000

csiph-web