Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671370

Re: Technical details

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Technical details
Date 2026-07-04 12:21 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <6A495D4A.1A88@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <18bd81f76f4d1a73$215267$260416$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <1123iiu$219ku$1@dont-email.me> <nap39uFgdj2U1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am Mittwoch000001, 01.07.2026 um 19:33 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
> > Den 29.06.2026 11:05, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
> >> Well, I'm an engineer.
> >
> > Then you know that "time" is what we measure with clocks.
> 
> that's nonsense, since 'is' (in the statement above) means:
> 
> the 'thing' we call 'time' would depend on clocks.
> 
> But that is absolutely untrue.
> 
> That would be equivalent to:
> 'the quantity length' would depend on yardsticks.
> 
> Instead:
> we have something that we call 'time', which can be measured with clocks
> (and other devices). But time does not depend on clocks (because clocks
> are man-made device), but is created as a feature of nature.
> 
> Our aim is now NOT the measurement of time, but to find out, why and how
> nature is able to maintain this feature
> 
> ...
> 
> TH


'In the beginning, ...'

Nature
is able
to maintain
this feature..
from the very beginning.

The Sun
The Moon


'In the beginning, ...The Time.


The Heavens
The Earth


I'll explain the very Nature of it..


First, a location..with boundaries

add a little Time

and Volia!

a stinky planet
with stinky girls


WHAT'S DAT SMELL???

	
you pee out of dat thing????


Wait a minute, i lost track, where was i?


'In the beginning, ...'


you maintain this feature
by clockwise and counter clockwise
Heavens and the Earth.

Now, where is the mechanism that makes the earth go round...?

Who is winding the clock?

No, not who...What.

What's on second.









-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-06-29 11:05 +0200
  Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-01 19:33 +0200
    Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-01 21:56 +0200
      Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 13:09 +0200
        Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 14:11 +0200
          Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 15:23 +0200
            Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 15:56 +0200
              Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 18:57 +0200
                Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 19:10 +0200
    Re: Technical details Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-03 08:31 +0200
      Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-03 10:21 +0200
      Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 12:21 -0700
        Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 12:34 -0700
        Re: Technical details Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-05 06:32 +0200
          Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 23:54 -0700

csiph-web