Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > ger.ct > #334807

Re: But the answer is 5!

From Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>
References (1 earlier) <0Te36cibIb8qNfm%dennis@coredump.d--p.de> <p24tj4$ohk$1@news.albasani.net> <r4bhhex06c.ln2@diedrich.ddnssec.de> <factorial-20171229161229@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <1t5a466dfdi4c3fn3e8%sfroehli@Froehlich.Priv.at>
Subject Re: But the answer is 5!
Message-ID <64ac68ecc7c3ec5cb456c914ddcd8e22@dizum.com> (permalink)
Date 2017-12-29 20:22 +0100
Newsgroups ger.ct
Organization dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider

Show all headers | View raw

Stefan Froehlich schrieb:

>On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 16:12:57 Stefan Ram wrote:
>>   Wenn ich »5!« sehe, ist die Fakultät schon etwas, das
>>   ich immer in Erwägung ziehe. Hier konnte ich diese
>>   Interpretation aber ausschließen, da unter ihr dem Satze
>>   "But the answer is 5!" ein Satzendzeichen fehlen würde.
>
>Mit einem Punkt hinter dem Rufzeichen wäre aber halt der
>(mittelmäßige) Gag kaputt gewesen.

Vielleicht nur drei Punkte dahinter: "BUT THE ANSWER IS 5! ..."

Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

But the answer is 5! Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2017-12-28 22:10 +0100
  Re: But the answer is 5! Dennis Preiser <d__p@d--p.de> - 2017-12-28 21:28 +0000
    Re: But the answer is 5! "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2017-12-29 09:15 +0100
      Re: But the answer is 5! Dennis Preiser <d__p@d--p.de> - 2017-12-29 08:20 +0000
        Re: But the answer is 5! "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2017-12-29 09:30 +0100
      Re: But the answer is 5! Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2017-12-29 09:21 +0100
        Re: But the answer is 5! "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2017-12-29 09:34 +0100
          Re: But the answer is 5! Lothar Frings <Lothar.Frings@gmx.de> - 2018-01-02 00:52 -0800
      Re: But the answer is 5! Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2017-12-29 09:31 +0100
        Re: But the answer is 5! Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2017-12-29 10:45 +0100
          Re: But the answer is 5! Gerald Gruner <gerald314@yahoo.de> - 2017-12-30 15:19 +0100
          Re: But the answer is 5! Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2017-12-30 23:47 +0100
        Re: But the answer is 5! Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2017-12-29 15:20 +0000
        Re: But the answer is 5! Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2017-12-29 16:32 +0000
          Re: But the answer is 5! Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2017-12-29 20:22 +0100
          Re: But the answer is 5! Lothar Frings <Lothar.Frings@gmx.de> - 2018-01-02 00:53 -0800
            Re: But the answer is 5! Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2018-01-02 10:36 +0000

csiph-web