Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | ger.ct |
| Subject | Re: But the answer is 5! |
| Date | 2017-12-29 09:31 +0100 |
| Organization | kreatives Chaos auf dem Schreibtisch |
| Message-ID | <r4bhhex06c.ln2@diedrich.ddnssec.de> (permalink) |
| References | <f78f35e55b211edff44985a3a53b360d@dizum.com> <0Te36cibIb8qNfm%dennis@coredump.d--p.de> <p24tj4$ohk$1@news.albasani.net> |
Dr. Joachim Neudert meinte: > Ich kapier es echt nicht, kann mir jemand erklären warum das 5 sein > soll? Ich hab auch eine Zeitlang gebraucht, bis der Groschen gefallen ist. Das Ausrufezeichen gehört nicht zur Aussage "Das Ergebnis ist", sondern zum Ergebnis - das Ergebnis ist nicht "5", sondern "5!" - 1*2*3*4*5=120 -- pgp-Key (RSA) 1024/09B8C0BD fingerprint = 2C 49 FF B2 C4 66 2D 93 6F A1 FF 10 16 59 96 F3 HTML-Mail wird ungeleſen entſorgt.
Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
But the answer is 5! Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2017-12-28 22:10 +0100
Re: But the answer is 5! Dennis Preiser <d__p@d--p.de> - 2017-12-28 21:28 +0000
Re: But the answer is 5! "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2017-12-29 09:15 +0100
Re: But the answer is 5! Dennis Preiser <d__p@d--p.de> - 2017-12-29 08:20 +0000
Re: But the answer is 5! "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2017-12-29 09:30 +0100
Re: But the answer is 5! Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2017-12-29 09:21 +0100
Re: But the answer is 5! "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2017-12-29 09:34 +0100
Re: But the answer is 5! Lothar Frings <Lothar.Frings@gmx.de> - 2018-01-02 00:52 -0800
Re: But the answer is 5! Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2017-12-29 09:31 +0100
Re: But the answer is 5! Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2017-12-29 10:45 +0100
Re: But the answer is 5! Gerald Gruner <gerald314@yahoo.de> - 2017-12-30 15:19 +0100
Re: But the answer is 5! Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2017-12-30 23:47 +0100
Re: But the answer is 5! Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2017-12-29 15:20 +0000
Re: But the answer is 5! Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2017-12-29 16:32 +0000
Re: But the answer is 5! Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2017-12-29 20:22 +0100
Re: But the answer is 5! Lothar Frings <Lothar.Frings@gmx.de> - 2018-01-02 00:53 -0800
Re: But the answer is 5! Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2018-01-02 10:36 +0000
csiph-web