Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #45895
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (2 earlier) <dh9hshFgdqjU2@mid.individual.net> <2881707241ec1c729256e56a3281cd4e@dizum.com> <n8ogfd$1ett$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fb1f718ebbcedd732695327fc9f94008@dizum.com> <n8pkl1$s64$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| Subject | Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. |
| Message-ID | <63a9b950114947fc137cd9cec9467ceb@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-02-02 16:30 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
<news:n8pkl1$s64$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
wood chipper again:
> After again pretending that tiny water droplets have zero scattering
> effect on radiation, a kOok again "cited":
>> <http://wattsupwiththat.com/20<FOOM!>
After again denying the well-known phenomenon of the infrared
atmospheric window, LunkHead the Klimate Katastrophe Kook bleated:
> "Highly pa<SMACKAKOOK!>
They've exposed more corruption in the AGW community than most other
sites, LunkHead. They are a three-time winner of "Best Science Blog".
All of the data thus far derived from that site, you've snipped out
and run away from. Coward. LOL
>> CO2 is not a greenhouse gas,
> I wonder how the ko0k explains Venus then.
Already addressed, you ran away from it, remember? LOL
Message-ID: <25368083160152e4217d824f28c969f5@dizum.com>
=======================================================
Yeah, Venus. With ~96% carbon dioxide constituent of the atmosphere.
With rampant volcanic activity and sulfuric acid clouds with an acid
concentration likely greater than 70%.
Sulfuric acid has exponential Lambert absorption coefficients in the
5500-14,500 cm^-1 region. Spectral reflectance for sulfuric acid falls
rapidly at frequencies below 6000 cm^-1. Although the absorption index
is small throughout the visible and near infrared, the radiant flux
from the sun is large in these spectral regions. It's the sulfuric
acid absorbing and trapping the heat on Venus, not the carbon dioxide.
You'll note that Mars has an atmosphere comprising ~95% carbon
dioxide, yet the temperature there falls to 220 F below zero on the
dark side of the planet. Because while carbon dioxide absorbs
efficiently in the infrared, it also *emits* efficiently in the
infrared, and thus on the dark side of the planet will re-emit to
space any heat it's gained on the light side of the planet, *along*
*with* any infrared that's been converted from other wavelengths... so
it actually causes a *cooling* effect overall. And experimental
observation bears that out.
Earth, with ~0.04% carbon dioxide constituent of the atmosphere. And
that's at near-historic lows. In the Ordovician, CO2 levels were at
least 5 times higher (and remember, this was long before man or even
any land-based life contributed to CO2 levels), sun output was only
0.09% different than today, and the earth slid into a glaciation
period that lasted a million years, killing the majority of life on
the planet. Given that CO2 levels are at least *5* *times* lower
today, why are we not in a perpetual glaciation period, if CO2 is such
a driver of global temperature?
Oh, that'd be because the same driver of climate throughout Earth's
existence is still in effect today... solar and orbital forcing. Man
has a negligible effect upon climate.
=======================================================
SPNAK! on LunkHead, who is yet again 180 degrees out from reality. LOL
>> the high CO2 concentration on Mars
> Concentration is meaningless. It's partial pressure that matters, ko0ky.
Yeah, that's why I also included that Mars has 14 times the CO2
partial pressure of Earth, which you cowardly snipped out, you
backpedaling idiot. LOL
>> blah blah blah the thermosphere, blah blah blah ~11-micron infrared
>> atmospheric window.
Your cowardly snipping and overwriting of the data you can't refute is
noted, LunkHead. You're losing. Badly. LOL
Fixored:
>> CO2 is not a greenhouse gas, it lags solar and orbital forcing-induced
>> temperature change by 600 to 1000 years, it emits partly at the
>> infrared atmospheric window (and what it doesn't emit at that window
>> gets reabsorbed and re-emitted until it _is_ emitted at the infrared
>> atmospheric window), and experiment has proven that increasing CO2
>> concentration causes increased *cooling* on the night side of the
>> planet and thus net global cooling, just as the high CO2 concentration
>> on Mars (more than 2000 times Earth's CO2 concentration, and 14 times
>> the partial pressure) causes wide day/night temperature swings.
>>
>> If the "runaway greenhouse" theory was correct, with the CO2 partial
>> pressure of Mars being 14 times that of Earth's, Mars would be a
>> hothouse despite it receiving only 1/4th the solar insolation... but
>> that's not the case, Mars has a mean temperature of ~-80F. Even at the
>> equator, where temperature can get to ~+70 F on a summer day, at night
>> it can still reach ~-100 F.
>>
>> Educate yourself, you moron:
>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
>> =================================================================
>> "Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," explains
>> James Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator.
>> "When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these
>> molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."
>>
>> For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
>> absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
>> the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
>> of that total back into space.
>>
>> {NOTE: They did this by absorbing then re-emitting that energy at the
>> wavelength of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.}
>> =================================================================
>>
>> SPNAK! on the moron who yet again finds herself 180 degrees out from
>> reality. LOL
That one stung your stoooopid ass so much you were forced to snip it
out *and* substitute your own blather. LOL!
> There's no water vapor to speak of up in the thermosphere, you twit, and
> barely any above the tropopause.
Your non sequitur is noted, LunkHead. Why did you bring up water vapor
when I ended with discussion about CO2, to include a peer-reviewed
NASA study that proved the underlying premise of you AGW Klimate
Katastrophe Kooks is a lie, thereby making AGW nothing more than a
politicized sham? The SABRE study was one of the dominant factors in
James Hansen retiring... it proved his entire premise was flawed, and
he had to get out before he lost his cushy retirement because of his
decades of climate fraud as means of pandering for research grants.
LOL
So you snipped all that out and attempted to divert attention to
"water vapor" because you're a spankard desperate to cover up the fact
that your stoooopid ass has been spanked to hamburger. Again. LOL
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
What's the matter, LibTard? Having trouble keeping up? Is reality
kicking your stoooopid libtard ass a little too hard, forcing you to
snip and run rather than refute the truth and reality I promulgate?
LOL!
Why can't you refute the unmanipulated satellite temperature data,
LunkHead? Why do you keep running from it? It's peer-reviewed data,
unmanipulated, unadjusted, from prestigious institutions of
research... and it proves you Klimate Katastrophe Kooks *wrong*. LOL!
<http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
*decrease*.
Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
*decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
<http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
cooling has set in... since 1998.
<http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
*Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
<http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
archived it):
<http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
"There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
is not statistically significant." - James Hansen
<http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
"We have been building models and there are now robust
contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
physical model says it has to be warming."
===============================================================
Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
<http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
"I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
relations problem for us." - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
out of the bag.
You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
===============================================================
SPNAK! on LunkHead, who can't refute the reality I promulgate.
<snicker>
--
Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded
that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied
having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of
course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she
failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy
and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the
DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as
such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a
mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's
"been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this
k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief
that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given
19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new
AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per
year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in
decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually
growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had
the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd
used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out
so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's
growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is
slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat);
she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling
for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the
revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to
give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a
warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature
change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same
web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature
change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then
she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being
forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the
driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been
unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher
in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991
Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she
presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were
conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the
result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a
conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that
takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to
provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them
as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and
k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that
she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her
ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was
a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame
that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals
(when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority
of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals),
she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience",
"profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's
thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 558 days and counting
(ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear
that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me
everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in
her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level
of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts
grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more
and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring
for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough
attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-28 18:17 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-01-28 19:10 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-29 00:17 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-28 21:14 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-29 05:37 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-28 22:24 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-01-29 06:23 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-29 02:56 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-29 14:45 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-01-30 06:07 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-30 01:25 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-01-30 16:43 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-30 17:16 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-01-30 17:57 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-01-31 19:53 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-30 19:03 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-01 17:10 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-01 18:41 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-01 11:07 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 13:25 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-01 11:31 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 13:43 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-01 11:51 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 14:08 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 08:19 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-01 15:50 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 15:59 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 07:38 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-02 02:08 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 16:30 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-02 08:53 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-02 17:21 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-02 11:33 -0600
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-02 22:21 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-02 16:55 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-02 16:44 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 04:52 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:14 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 07:07 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:45 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-03 04:26 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-02 05:03 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-02 04:11 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:17 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-01-31 05:26 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-30 22:15 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-31 00:37 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-30 22:42 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-01 17:00 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-01 15:54 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 16:03 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-01 14:09 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 07:28 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-02 02:09 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 17:32 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-02 12:56 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:14 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-02 16:59 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-02 16:45 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 05:10 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-02 23:24 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:17 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-02 21:49 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 06:51 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:44 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-03 07:19 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:41 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 00:47 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-03 08:57 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-03 04:26 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 02:38 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 18:33 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 11:18 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-03 04:26 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:12 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Antonio Santana <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-29 10:52 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. MartinS <me@my.place.invalid> - 2016-01-29 11:49 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-29 17:41 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-01-29 20:56 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-29 19:56 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-01-30 17:58 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-30 18:53 -0800
csiph-web