Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #397090
| Message-ID | <5813FF3D.3904@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-28 18:45 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Penrose's new book |
| References | <7505c382-b205-4514-85a0-c312e30e4339@googlegroups.com> <be12eefe-d01b-4bbd-9081-5b8da5345683@googlegroups.com> |
JanPB wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 8:20:31 PM UTC-7, Ross A. Finlayson wrote: > > R. Penrose's book is pretty great. > > > > It's a pretty good single source for > > a lot of what is under consideration > > in foundations as would need reconcile > > with theory and experiment. > > > > Following "Road to Reality" as the modern > > treatise on mathematical physics, this new > > book "Fashion, Faith, and Fantasy in the > > New Physics of the Universe" outlays much > > of the necessary complement of background > > to give the modern reader in physics a > > relevant perspective to issues in questions > > in modern physics. > > > > I'd more highly recommend it but I'm only > > on page 70. Otherwise my taste lies with, > > for example, Davies as one of the great > > explicators (and of very sound physics), > > Hawking is not poor, lately I read some > > Bohr and it was very good. > > > > I'd be interested in your comments as you > > know it or have read it. > > Penrose is one of my fav. writers (except his speculation on the "ideal > world" are hopelessly naive IMHO, people have been thinking about this > stuff literally for milennia, unfortunately studying it is completely > out of fashion for scientists these days - long story). > > Glancing at the table of content: it looks very similar to his other > books, what's the difference? > > Another oddity: not a single mention of the quantum eraser according to > the Amazon search). > > -- > Jan One mustn't forget...quantum theory is ..just a theory. quantum eraser erasers quantum.. It isn't there because quantum theory is not there. You cannot understand that which does not exist.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 20:20 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book Walter Bautista <wabau@outlookbay.org> - 2016-10-26 16:47 +0000
Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 18:57 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2016-10-27 07:19 -0600
Re: Penrose's new book JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 13:07 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 21:26 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-28 18:45 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-28 20:22 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-28 21:34 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 06:23 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 12:19 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-29 21:04 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-30 12:27 -0800
Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 13:14 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 23:51 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 22:16 -0700
Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 20:02 -0800
csiph-web