Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #397090

Re: Penrose's new book

Message-ID <5813FF3D.3904@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-10-28 18:45 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Penrose's new book
References <7505c382-b205-4514-85a0-c312e30e4339@googlegroups.com> <be12eefe-d01b-4bbd-9081-5b8da5345683@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


JanPB wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 8:20:31 PM UTC-7, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> > R. Penrose's book is pretty great.
> >
> > It's a pretty good single source for
> > a lot of what is under consideration
> > in foundations as would need reconcile
> > with theory and experiment.
> >
> > Following "Road to Reality" as the modern
> > treatise on mathematical physics, this new
> > book "Fashion, Faith, and Fantasy in the
> > New Physics of the Universe" outlays much
> > of the necessary complement of background
> > to give the modern reader in physics a
> > relevant perspective to issues in questions
> > in modern physics.
> >
> > I'd more highly recommend it but I'm only
> > on page 70.  Otherwise my taste lies with,
> > for example, Davies as one of the great
> > explicators (and of very sound physics),
> > Hawking is not poor, lately I read some
> > Bohr and it was very good.
> >
> > I'd be interested in your comments as you
> > know it or have read it.
> 
> Penrose is one of my fav. writers (except his speculation on the "ideal
> world" are hopelessly naive IMHO, people have been thinking about this
> stuff literally for milennia, unfortunately studying it is completely
> out of fashion for scientists these days - long story).
> 
> Glancing at the table of content: it looks very similar to his other
> books, what's the difference?
> 
> Another oddity: not a single mention of the quantum eraser according to
> the Amazon search).
> 
> --
> Jan


One mustn't forget...quantum theory is ..just a theory.

quantum eraser erasers quantum..

It isn't there because quantum theory is not there.

You cannot understand that which does not exist.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 20:20 -0700
  Re: Penrose's new book Walter Bautista <wabau@outlookbay.org> - 2016-10-26 16:47 +0000
    Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 18:57 -0700
  Re: Penrose's new book Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2016-10-27 07:19 -0600
  Re: Penrose's new book JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 13:07 -0700
    Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 21:26 -0700
    Re: Penrose's new book The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-28 18:45 -0700
      Re: Penrose's new book Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-28 20:22 -0700
        Re: Penrose's new book The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-28 21:34 -0700
          Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 06:23 -0700
            Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 12:19 -0700
              Re: Penrose's new book The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-29 21:04 -0700
                Re: Penrose's new book The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-30 12:27 -0800
                Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 13:14 -0700
                Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 23:51 -0700
                Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 22:16 -0700
                Re: Penrose's new book "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 20:02 -0800

csiph-web