Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #600231
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Particle physics |
| Date | 2016-10-10 13:22 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <57FB881D.3020203@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (21 earlier) <nsp7m5$6cr$5@gioia.aioe.org> <57F0341F.5040506@PointedEars.de> <nsu6b7$1e7d$1@gioia.aioe.org> <57F4B9B9.7050605@PointedEars.de> <nt8400$1p2l$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
Odd Bodkin wrote on 07.10.2016 13:21: > On 10/5/2016 3:28 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Exactly *none* of the sources that you cited and quoted corroborates your >> claim that “Physicists […] say [that] *light* *is* a quantum field.” >> (emphasis mine) Not even one. It is not verbatim in any quotation, and it >> cannot reasonably be concluded from any combination of statements from the >> quotations. >> >> [What can be concluded from them is (what I already knew): Light >> (like every electrostatic, electrodynamic and magnetic phenomenon) >> can be understood as an excitation of the electromagnetic field, >> and that photons are the quanta (elementary excitations) of that >> field; they are “field quanta”.] > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon > First sentence. Yes, and you still do not understand is that this correct sentence still does not mean that “light is a quantum field”, contrary to what you claimed. >> You have completely misunderstood what you have read (e.g. reading “quantum >> field” where it is written “field quantum”); assuming that you really have >> read it. That does not surprise me. > > I'm a little surprised that you think quantum field theory does not use > both the terms "quantum field" and "field quantum". See additional > material from books cited. Unfortunately, you have no clue what you are talking about. -- PointedEars
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:52 -0500
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-02 00:09 +0200
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 07:33 +0200
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 08:44 -0700
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-05 10:15 +0200
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 17:14 +0200
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-05 17:21 +0200
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 09:03 -0700
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 19:43 +0200
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 13:12 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 18:04 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:00 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 07:20 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:49 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 08:11 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 10:41 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:21 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 11:43 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 10:25 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 12:51 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 12:59 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 16:15 -0500
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 23:41 +0200
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 23:45 +0200
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 17:11 -0500
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 07:14 +0200
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 07:20 +0200
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 07:59 +0200
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-07 00:50 +0000
Re: Particle physics edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-13 07:47 -0700
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 08:18 -0700
Re: Particle physics edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-13 10:21 -0700
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 10:44 -0700
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-13 18:26 +0000
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-07 00:40 +0000
Re: Particle physics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 04:31 -0700
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-06 22:56 -0700
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-05 23:30 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 13:00 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 07:28 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 06:00 -0700
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 06:47 -0700
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 07:16 -0700
Re: Particle physics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 07:40 -0700
Re: Particle physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-04 19:05 -0400
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 09:53 -0500
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-04 14:47 +0000
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 08:58 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 09:53 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 08:51 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 11:14 -0500
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-06 04:04 +0200
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 09:53 -0500
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 08:51 -0700
Re: Particle physics rockbrentwood@gmail.com - 2016-10-07 10:22 -0700
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 08:41 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 10:59 -0500
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 11:10 -0700
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 08:48 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 11:12 -0500
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-05 10:28 +0200
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 07:21 -0500
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 18:47 +0200
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-10 13:31 +0100
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 05:53 -0700
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 07:43 -0700
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-10 13:22 +0100
csiph-web