Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #45915
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (2 earlier) <n8ogfd$1ett$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fb1f718ebbcedd732695327fc9f94008@dizum.com> <n8pkl1$s64$1@gioia.aioe.org> <63a9b950114947fc137cd9cec9467ceb@dizum.com> <n8r8kf$1ofn$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| Subject | Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. |
| Message-ID | <5331728a054f3d31c38877113240ddac@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-02-03 04:52 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in <news:n8r8kf$1ofn$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 02/02/2016 10:30 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in >> <news:n8pkl1$s64$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the >> wood chipper again: >>> After again pretending that tiny water droplets have zero scattering >>> effect on radiation, a kOok again "cited": >>>> <http://wattsupwiththat.com/20<FOOM!> >>> "Highly partisan and untrustworthy." >> They've exposed more corruption in the AGW community than most other >> sites, LunkHead. They are a three-time winner of "Best Science Blog". > "The Weblog Awards, nicknamed the Bloggies, are annual non-profit blog > awards that have been presented since 2001. They are the longest running > and one of the largest blog awards, with winners determined through > internet voting by the public." > > Hee hee! Internet voting by the public! How scientific. Yeah, and those presidential elections. "Voting by the public! Hee hee! How scientific." Moron. LOL > How many times did you reset your DHCP lease and vote again, along with > your conservative buddies and their numerous sockpuppets, kOok? I note you've completely avoided by diversion the main gist of the topic, that they've exposed more corruption in the AGW community than most other sites, and that you've run away from every bit of data that site references. That'd be because you're a moron and a backpedaling coward. LOL >> All of the data thus far derived from that site, you've snipped out > This is a newsgroup, not a farm. It does not need to be slathered with a > thick layer of horse manure. Except you've snipped out all their references to data from NASA, NOAA, UK Met, NSIDC, RSS, SIDC SILSO proving that global cooling is occurring. Why are you denying the climate change that has been proven to be occurring, LunkHead? Why are you a climate denier? LOL >>>> the high CO2 concentration on Mars >>> Concentration is meaningless. It's partial pressure that matters, ko0ky. >> Yeah, that's why I also included that Mars has 14 times the CO2 >> partial pressure of Earth, > And that's only a tiny part of the big picture, which also includes such > minor little matters as distance from the sun. Yeah, that's why I also mentioned that Mars has 1/4th the solar insolation of Earth, which you also cowardly snipped out, Backpedaling Cowardly Moron. LOL > It would take a much larger amount of CO2 to keep Mars warm That assumes that CO2 causes global warming. It does not. It causes global cooling, as the SABER study from NASA proved, LunkHead. You know, the peer-reviewed empirical data from the SABER study that proved that CO2 absorbs and reradiates out to space in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window... the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window you've denied exists... the SABER study that proves CO2 is a global *coolant*, not a greenhouse gas. Spankard. LOL > than it takes to keep Earth warm, > not merely the same amount. And Earth's CO2 gets support from other > things, like water vapor. "support" LOL! Moron says CO2 on Earth at 0.04% concentration and 14 times less partial pressure than that on Mars is only getting "support" from water vapor, which has been proven to be a cause of global warming, and is ten times more prevalent in the atmosphere than CO2. And that's not even taking into account that CO2 has been proven by *two* experiments now to cause global *cooling*. LOL! Does your delusion extend to other areas of your life besides climate denialism, LunkHead? You know, something like you wasting your pathetic life hunting for mushrooms so you don't have to spend time around other people, because they'd learn you're a weirdo freak? Just an example, mind you. LOL >>>> blah blah blah the thermosphere, blah blah blah ~11-micron infrared >>>> atmospheric window. >>> There's no water vapor to speak of up in the thermosphere, you twit, and >>> barely any above the tropopause. >> Your non sequitur is noted, LunkHead. Why did you bring up water vapor > Because your precious 11-micron infrared atmospheric window has to do > with the transmission vs. absorption spectrum of water vapor. Which > makes it all but irrelevant to processes above the tropopause. Something > you apparently did not realize. The ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window extends all the way up into space by its very definition, you moronic half-wit. "The infrared atmospheric window is the overall dynamic property of the earth's atmosphere, taken as a whole at each place and occasion of interest, that lets some infrared radiation from the cloud tops and land-sea surface pass directly to space without intermediate absorption and re-emission, and thus without heating the atmosphere." What about that *don't* you understand, you drooling monobrowed low-IQ idiot? LOL >> <http://www.breitbart.com/<ZZZAP!> >> <http://www.globalresearch.ca/<ZZZZAP!> >> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/<ZZZZZAP!> > Voltage goes up by 100 every time you quote a right wing pseudoscience > site, ko0ky. Awww, look at LunkHead denying reality again. Why do you find yourself utterly unable to reconcile yourself to the reality that the underlying data proves the planet is cooling, LunkHead? LOL Why can't you refute the unmanipulated satellite temperature data, LunkHead? Why do you keep running from it? It's peer-reviewed data, unmanipulated, unadjusted, from prestigious institutions of research... and it proves you Klimate Katastrophe Kooks *wrong*. LOL! <http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/> The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating) *decrease*. Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com> The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F *decrease* from 2005 to 2015. <http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI> Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global cooling has set in... since 1998. <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data. Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998. *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17 years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years: <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine archived it): <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling* temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose. "There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that is not statistically significant." - James Hansen <http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html> "We have been building models and there are now robust contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The physical model says it has to be warming." =============================================================== Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails: <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public relations problem for us." - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the bag. You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL =============================================================== SPNAK! on LunkHead, who can't refute the reality I promulgate. <snicker> -- Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals (when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 558 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-28 18:17 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-01-28 19:10 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-29 00:17 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-28 21:14 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-29 05:37 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-28 22:24 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-01-29 06:23 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-29 02:56 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-29 14:45 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-01-30 06:07 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-30 01:25 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-01-30 16:43 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-30 17:16 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-01-30 17:57 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-01-31 19:53 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-30 19:03 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-01 17:10 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-01 18:41 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-01 11:07 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 13:25 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-01 11:31 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 13:43 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-01 11:51 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 14:08 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 08:19 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-01 15:50 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 15:59 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 07:38 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-02 02:08 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 16:30 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-02 08:53 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-02 17:21 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-02 11:33 -0600
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-02 22:21 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-02 16:55 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-02 16:44 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 04:52 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:14 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 07:07 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:45 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-03 04:26 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-02 05:03 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-02 04:11 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:17 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-01-31 05:26 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-30 22:15 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-31 00:37 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-30 22:42 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-01 17:00 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-01 15:54 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 16:03 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-01 14:09 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 07:28 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-02 02:09 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 17:32 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-02 12:56 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:14 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-02 16:59 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-02 16:45 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 05:10 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-02 23:24 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:17 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-02 21:49 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 06:51 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:44 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-03 07:19 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:41 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 00:47 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-03 08:57 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-03 04:26 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 02:38 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 18:33 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 11:18 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-03 04:26 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:12 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Antonio Santana <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-29 10:52 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. MartinS <me@my.place.invalid> - 2016-01-29 11:49 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-29 17:41 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-01-29 20:56 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-29 19:56 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-01-30 17:58 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-30 18:53 -0800
csiph-web