Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: what is the best way |
| Date | 2012-11-27 13:14 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <50B502FC.7060903@verizon.net> (permalink) |
| References | <50b4d9fc$0$3108$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> |
On 11/27/2012 10:19 AM, Andre wrote: > to organize source in a multi soucres project. > Is a main.h file with every definition for every sources the best or > a each.h file for each.c file the best. > It's a verry loooong time last I used c. There's lots of different ways to do this. My own convention has been to create one header file for each module, which will in general contain multiple function definitions, but usually only one with external linkage. The header file will provide declarations for every identifier with external linkage defined in that module. If there are no such identifiers (this is often the case for the module which defines main()), no header is needed. The header will also contain definitions for every typedef and every struct, union, or enumeration needed by those declarations. If there are any special values associated with the arguments or return value of any of the functions it declares, it will #define macros for those values. Every #define and type definition will appear explicitly only in one particular header file; they will be #included into any other header where needed. For libraries, the headers associated with each module in the library are used only for compiling those modules. I prepare a special header for users of the library, declaring only those identifiers with external linkage that users are intended to access, along with the associated types and macros.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
what is the best way Andre <pas.mois@ailleur.be> - 2012-11-27 16:19 +0100
Re: what is the best way Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-27 15:35 +0000
Re: what is the best way Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-27 08:59 -0800
Re: what is the best way James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-27 13:14 -0500
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-28 08:43 +1300
Re: what is the best way James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-27 15:02 -0500
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-28 09:29 +1300
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-27 12:48 -0600
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-28 08:56 +1300
Re: what is the best way Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-27 22:19 +0000
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-27 18:21 -0600
Re: what is the best way Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-28 05:08 -0800
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-28 12:43 -0600
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-27 18:15 -0600
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-28 14:21 +1300
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-27 20:06 -0600
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-28 15:21 +1300
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-27 20:31 -0600
Re: what is the best way glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-11-28 04:00 +0000
Re: what is the best way Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-28 05:17 -0800
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-29 08:30 +1300
Re: what is the best way Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-29 05:47 -0800
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-30 07:37 +1300
Re: what is the best way Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-29 11:35 -0800
Re: what is the best way Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-27 17:25 -0800
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-27 20:15 -0600
Re: what is the best way pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-11-27 23:48 -0500
Re: what is the best way Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-11-28 03:06 -0200
Re: what is the best way pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-11-28 01:35 -0500
Re: what is the best way pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-11-28 00:13 -0500
csiph-web