Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: what is the best way |
| Date | 2012-11-29 08:30 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <ahn72dFn8fdU7@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <k93l11$8kp$1@dont-email.me> <ahl79gFn8fdU4@mid.individual.net> <k93rh8$3ks$1@dont-email.me> <ahlapvFn8fdU6@mid.individual.net> <0f724d75-0cd2-4d2b-af1b-807e3acb704a@googlegroups.com> |
Malcolm McLean wrote: > On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 2:21:50 AM UTC, Ian Collins wrote: >> Les Cargill wrote: >> >>> I dunno - at least conceptually, it's simpler for me if I hold >>> to a separately compiled module being roughly a "class", where the >>> header is the "interface". >> >> Ah, I see a different in metaphor here. >> >> I would describe the collection of source files (typically in their own >> directory with a makefile) used to implement the interface declared in a >> header as a module. You appear to be describing an individual source >> file as a module. >> > I try to keep one module per file. > > So, for example, lets say I'm writing a string-intensive program that does a > lot of counting of characters. I might have one module that does DNA > sequences, and another that does protein sequences. > So they'll both have > > /* count the number of times ch appears in str */ > static int countchars(char *str, int ch) You forgot the const :) > defined in the source file, purely to keep modules as one file, depending > on nothing else. That looks like code duplication for the sake of a doctrine. This sounds like a text book example of when to use a shared library. > But if a file becomes too complex, I will reluctantly split it. That depends on your definition of "too complex". Another good reason for splitting is "too slow": when a monolithic file takes longer to compile than the equivalent set of smaller files. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
what is the best way Andre <pas.mois@ailleur.be> - 2012-11-27 16:19 +0100
Re: what is the best way Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-27 15:35 +0000
Re: what is the best way Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-27 08:59 -0800
Re: what is the best way James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-27 13:14 -0500
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-28 08:43 +1300
Re: what is the best way James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-27 15:02 -0500
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-28 09:29 +1300
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-27 12:48 -0600
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-28 08:56 +1300
Re: what is the best way Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-27 22:19 +0000
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-27 18:21 -0600
Re: what is the best way Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-28 05:08 -0800
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-28 12:43 -0600
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-27 18:15 -0600
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-28 14:21 +1300
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-27 20:06 -0600
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-28 15:21 +1300
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-27 20:31 -0600
Re: what is the best way glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-11-28 04:00 +0000
Re: what is the best way Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-28 05:17 -0800
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-29 08:30 +1300
Re: what is the best way Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-29 05:47 -0800
Re: what is the best way Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-30 07:37 +1300
Re: what is the best way Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-29 11:35 -0800
Re: what is the best way Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-27 17:25 -0800
Re: what is the best way Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-27 20:15 -0600
Re: what is the best way pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-11-27 23:48 -0500
Re: what is the best way Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-11-28 03:06 -0200
Re: what is the best way pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-11-28 01:35 -0500
Re: what is the best way pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-11-28 00:13 -0500
csiph-web