Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage > #2651
| Date | 2012-02-17 23:37 +1100 |
|---|---|
| From | Rob <mesamine@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage |
| Subject | Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters |
| References | (8 earlier) <9q591gF1gmU1@mid.individual.net> <4f3d7b74$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <9q5f1eFfnjU1@mid.individual.net> <4f3d8df0$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <9q5kqhFo6jU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Message-ID | <4f3e4a18@dnews.tpgi.com.au> (permalink) |
On 17/02/2012 11:20 AM, Rod Speed wrote: > Rob wrote >> Rod Speed wrote >>> Rob wrote >>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>> Yousuf Khan wrote >>>>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>>>> Rob wrote > >>>>>>>> Sorry its on a 14Gb partition which has the backup files. > >>>>>>>> 6.1Gb 20,000files 3700 folders > >>>>>>>> That better! > >>>>>>> Yeah, that makes much more sense. > >>>>>>> But you now have a problem with why it takes 5 DVDs. > >>>>>>> Even a very crude sector by sector copy of the whole 14GB wont take 5 SL DVDs. > >>>>>> It's actually 4 data DVD's, plus one DVD that contains the Windows recovery environment. > >>>>> The maths still dont add up. > >>>>> That can only account for 3 SL DVDs at most and the Win7 distribution does it fine in a single DVD. > >>>>> Add another for the extra crap like Office and Nortons etc and it still doesnt add up. > >>>> I tried to install Office off the files but it will not work. So I assume that there must be an installer somewhere >>>> within those files and folders. > >>>> When I had problems with the windows install and used the backup on >>>> the HDD it took 2.5hrs to delete the files > >>> Sounds like a complete abortion to take so long to do something as basic as that. > >>>> then another 1.5hrs to install the system up again > >>> Even odder that it takes twice as long to delete as to install. > >>>> and in doing so installed all the extras again which were on the >>>> backup. No options. > >>> Yeah, thats not that unusual. You often only get the option of 32 or 64 bit versions. > >> On the first install it gave the option of 32 or 64 somehow I messed >> up the install of 64 which had started. On a reboot it went straight >> into completing the first install. But this ended up as 32 bit, think >> it must have defaulted into 32. > > Sounds very plausible/likely. > >> Now when you work off the B/Up partition starting with the prompts, >> and selecting x64, you remove all files off C: this tells you it will take 2.5hrs to complete which is exactly what >> it took, no fast tracking etc. > > Biuzarre that it takes that long to do something that basic. > > It certainly doesnt when you use the standard Win7 Ultimate > and change between 32 bit and 64 bit versions and I know > that because I did that a number of times when working out > whether a few of the quirks I did see when moving to Win7 > were due to the 64 bit version or not. > >> After that it proceeds to install the system etc again this tells you the exact time to complete the installation. > > None of the Win7 installs from the official MS Win7 > Ultimate DVD take anything like that long either even > when you include the time to install Office and Nortons etc. > I haven't seen that either when installing W7 Ult. The Toshiba came with Pro x32 and x64. It a Toshiba setup screen not the regular W7. >> I didn't try to manually remove the files off C: because I didn't want >> to loose the BUp partition - you can't see that partition under normal >> circumstances (nor can I understand the file system) > >> Good learning curve. :) > > Yeah, its certainly that sort of thing that gets a better understanding of the basics. > > The other obvious question tho is why you lot dont just shrink the bootable > C drive installed partition and use the free space you have created that > way for the Linux partition you want to add to the Toshiba config. > >
Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 10:59 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> - 2012-02-12 06:46 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 07:15 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 13:00 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 08:53 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 21:54 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 19:31 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 07:04 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2012-02-11 19:02 -0500
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 13:21 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 22:05 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 19:39 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 19:24 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 19:37 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-13 19:52 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-13 22:20 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-13 22:31 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-15 02:40 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-14 20:51 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-15 16:12 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-15 02:36 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Rob <mesamine@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 03:15 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 07:43 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Rob <mesamine@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 14:29 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 16:05 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2012-02-16 12:40 -0500
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 07:59 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Rob <mesamine@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 08:55 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 09:41 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Rob <mesamine@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 10:14 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 11:20 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Rob <mesamine@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 23:37 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-18 01:02 +1100
csiph-web