Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage > #2627
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage |
| Subject | Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters |
| Date | 2012-02-13 19:52 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <9ps1b3F78vU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <4f370181$1@news.bnb-lp.com> <9pom26F73eU1@mid.individual.net> <3dcaf404-325a-4662-870b-5b9f6fde2df8@w9g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> <9ppc5lFl2tU1@mid.individual.net> <9c618224-0fd5-49fe-bed6-df9af5336783@hs8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
AndyHancock wrote > Rod Speed <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote >> AndyHancock wrote >>> Rod Speed <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote >>>> Yousuf Khan wrote >>>>> AndyHancock wrote >>>>>> Partitions 1,3,4 do not have letter drives. So I was wondering >>>>>> whether I can still use chkdsk (and if I can do that for all the >>>>>> partitions at once, so much the better). I've surfed and found >>>>>> info on assigning letters to the partitions, but that option is >>>>>> grayed out in Disk Management. I am also concerned about >>>>>> possible side effects of assigning letters on the intended >>>>>> functions of those drives. >>>>> Looks like we had the same issues recently. I bought a new >>>>> Toshiba laptop too. What I did was changed the Type 17 partitions >>>>> to Type 07, and then rebooted. They were automatically added with >>>>> their own drive letters after the reboot. I don't see any reason >>>>> why just mounting them with drive letters is going to corrupt >>>>> them in any way. >>> However, 0x07 and 0x17 can have three different file systems. >> More than that, actually. >>> I suspect that imagers rely on more than the partition type code to >>> determine the file system. >>> BTW, I didn't say this in my last follow-up, but I also want to >>> chkdsk partition 1, which is letterless and (I'm told) is the boot >>> partition. Would that be wise? >> No, I dont even chkdsk normal NTFS partitions unless I know they >> arent too bad, it can comprehensively stuff up a partition. >>> I realize that I can always restore partition 1 from a clone, but >>> just wondering. >> It should be fine, you can always do a read only chkdsk to be safe. > Well, I used PowerQuest Partition Table Editor to change partitions 3 > & 4 from 0x17 to 0x07 (unhidden). They got drive letters after a > reboot. Chkdsk on them was uneventful. I changed them back to 0x17. > I then changed partition 1 from 0x27 to 0x07. It did not receive a > driver letter after a reboot, but it did reboot. I could use Disk > Management to assign a drive letter. Chkdsk issued the warning > "WARNING! F parameter not specified.". The chkdsk then completed > without any interesting messages. Partition 1 showed up in Disk > Management as "System (E:)" and had the tags "Healthy (System, Active, > Primary Partition)". I changed it back to 0x27 and am rebooting. If > I seem to have fallen off the face of the earth, it means things didn't > go well after the reboot (though I may come back using the clone). > Rod, what did you mean by stuff up a partition? That was a bit carelessly described, I meant that it can see some files go missing.
Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 10:59 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> - 2012-02-12 06:46 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 07:15 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 13:00 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 08:53 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 21:54 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 19:31 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 07:04 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2012-02-11 19:02 -0500
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 13:21 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 22:05 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 19:39 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 19:24 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-12 19:37 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-13 19:52 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-13 22:20 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-13 22:31 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-15 02:40 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-02-14 20:51 -0800
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-15 16:12 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-15 02:36 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Rob <mesamine@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 03:15 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 07:43 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Rob <mesamine@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 14:29 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 16:05 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2012-02-16 12:40 -0500
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 07:59 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Rob <mesamine@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 08:55 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 09:41 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Rob <mesamine@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 10:14 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 11:20 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters Rob <mesamine@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 23:37 +1100
Re: chkdsk all partitions at once, including those without drive letters "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-18 01:02 +1100
csiph-web