Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #563688

Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics?

Show all headers | View raw

On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 11:43:41 AM UTC-7, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:27:09 -0700 (PDT), James McGinn wrote:
> 
> >On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 11:06:38 AM UTC-7, Wally W. wrote:
> >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 10:37:55 -0700 (PDT), James McGinn wrote:
> >> 
> >> >On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 8:14:39 AM UTC-7, Wally W. wrote:
> >> >> Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics?
> >> >> 
> >> >> Why don't they post instead to groups where weather is on topic?
> >> >
> >> >Discussing the physics of the atmosphere (ie. storm theory) is strictly a taboo subject for meteorologists.  
> >> 
> >> So it is a political move: you are looking here for allies in your
> >> fight against meteorologists?
> >> 
> >> How is that going for you?
> >
> >Are you willing and able to discuss the content of meteorology's storm theory?
> 
> It is not on topic in sci.physics to the extent you whinge about it
> here.

Is the atmosphere not physical?

> 
> >Do you understand . . . or do you just believe?
> 
> When reading sci.physics, how much to you think I should care?

Why wouldn't you?

> 
> 
> >How would you even know?
> >
> >Does convection theory make sense to you?  

Gee golly, no response here.  Hmm.  I wonder why?

> >
> >What do you think it indicates if you are unable to explain what you think you know?
> >
> >What do you think it indicates if you have a emotional reaction to your inability to explain what you think you know?  
> >
> >What emotions were you feeling when you made the first post on this thread.
> 
> Frustration with people who relentlessly spew off-topic in
> sci.physics.

Hmm.  Yet you have no presence in this NG.  Hmm.

> 
> >Think about it.
> 
> I did. Now that you have an answer to your question above, what do you
> intend to do with it?

Tell us why you wouldn't answer the question about convection?

> 
> At least Sam posts about topics other than his hobby horse.
> 
> If one can call his copy-and-paste spews "posting."

So, here's a topic for discussion. What do you think it indicates when the most prominent advocates of a scientific notion are unwilling or unable to discuss its details? 

Allow me to provide two subcategories to provide focus for this discussion:
Climatology: Global Warming
Meteorology: Storm Theory

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 11:14 -0400
  Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:44 -0700
    Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-19 14:01 -0500
      Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 05:47 -0700
  Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 10:37 -0700
    Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 14:06 -0400
      Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 11:27 -0700
        Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 14:43 -0400
          Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 12:19 -0700
            Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 15:24 -0400
              Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 12:33 -0700
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-19 20:01 +0000
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 19:36 -0400
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 23:10 -0700
            Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 22:44 -0700
              Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 23:20 -0700
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-20 03:01 -0400
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 00:09 -0700
        Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-20 17:52 +0000
          Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 10:59 -0700
            Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-20 19:06 +0000
              Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 12:18 -0700
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-20 21:22 +0000
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 14:40 -0700
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-20 23:20 +0000
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-21 01:22 +0000
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 18:26 -0700
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-21 01:56 +0000
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 19:06 -0700
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 02:23 -0400
                Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 19:18 -0700
          Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 16:01 -0700
            Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-21 01:19 +0000
  Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-19 18:46 -0500
    Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 18:17 -0700
      OCO is heavier than air, but HOH noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 18:18 -0700

csiph-web