Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #563993
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? |
| Date | 2016-03-20 23:20 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <5qn3sc-64g.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <578d2706-d6e5-4aad-97b0-41118702bd8a@googlegroups.com> <ncmsat$r74$2@pcls7.std.com> <89faae87-aa53-4c02-a298-898a1ac0f90d@googlegroups.com> <ncn49p$40l$2@pcls7.std.com> <80b2db1b-d40b-4915-8bfc-ecc88049f698@googlegroups.com> |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 2:22:25 PM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote: >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >Using gas laws what is difference in weight between moist air and dry air. >> >> >> >> Simple. Moist air is lighter because H2O molecules (MW=18) displace >> >> air molecules (avg. MW=~29). The rules of partial pressures. >> >> >Vague. How much lighter. Do the math. >> >> I am not Google. You can find what you need on Google, on weather or >> piloting sites. >> >> Or you can do the math. It is pretty much lighter by >> ((29-18)/29) * (percent of air that is water vapor)/100. > > So, you really don't have a point. Do you? You mean other than you are quite insane and utterly blind to reality? -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 11:14 -0400
Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:44 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-19 14:01 -0500
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 05:47 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 10:37 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 14:06 -0400
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 11:27 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 14:43 -0400
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 12:19 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 15:24 -0400
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 12:33 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-19 20:01 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 19:36 -0400
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 23:10 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 22:44 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 23:20 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-20 03:01 -0400
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 00:09 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-20 17:52 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 10:59 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-20 19:06 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 12:18 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-20 21:22 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 14:40 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-20 23:20 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-21 01:22 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 18:26 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-21 01:56 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 19:06 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 02:23 -0400
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 19:18 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 16:01 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-21 01:19 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-19 18:46 -0500
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 18:17 -0700
OCO is heavier than air, but HOH noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 18:18 -0700
csiph-web