Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #563874
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? |
| Date | 2016-03-20 17:52 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <ncmo1h$r7u$2@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <6vqqeb551t7s62t4iam3gi739qr9pjf8ta@4ax.com> <15b544b3-2090-4946-b3c5-da4eb8501871@googlegroups.com> <n45reb9peocu6m7m9u1s5am6dtik5pldng@4ax.com> <74eaf874-0aa4-4d51-a70a-274172181928@googlegroups.com> |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> writes: >> So it is a political move: you are looking here for allies in your >> fight against meteorologists? >> >> How is that going for you? >Are you willing and able to discuss the content of meteorology's storm >theory? >Do you understand . . . or do you just believe? >How would you even know? I don't know meteorology specifically, but I do know the chemistry and physics behind it, such as the gas laws. A few days ago, they started predicting a snowstorm for us from a storm that hadn't even formed yet. The storm formed when and where predicted and will hit us tonight, as predicted. They do have issues with the exact track, as the forecast for where I am has varied between a coating to 6-12 inches, depending on the exact path. (I haven't seen the forecast for today yet) So, they do seem to have things pretty much correct. >Does convection theory make sense to you? From both physics and chemistry theory, and from demonstrations I saw in college, yes. >What do you think it indicates if you have a emotional reaction to your >inability to explain what you think you know? >What emotions were you feeling when you made the first post on this thread. Why do you keep projecting your own reactions onto others?
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 11:14 -0400
Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:44 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-19 14:01 -0500
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 05:47 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 10:37 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 14:06 -0400
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 11:27 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 14:43 -0400
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 12:19 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 15:24 -0400
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 12:33 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-19 20:01 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-19 19:36 -0400
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 23:10 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 22:44 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 23:20 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-20 03:01 -0400
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 00:09 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-20 17:52 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 10:59 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-20 19:06 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 12:18 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-20 21:22 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 14:40 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-20 23:20 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-21 01:22 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 18:26 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-21 01:56 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 19:06 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 02:23 -0400
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 19:18 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 16:01 -0700
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-21 01:19 +0000
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-19 18:46 -0500
Re: Why did the weather fanbois Wormley and McGinn choose sci.physics? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 18:17 -0700
OCO is heavier than air, but HOH noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 18:18 -0700
csiph-web