Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compression > #224

Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs

From human <noreply@elfavo.com>
Newsgroups comp.compression
Subject Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs
Date 2011-05-08 17:55 +0200
Organization humanity
Message-ID <4DC6BD08.79C2123@elfavo.com> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <946afd41-cc84-4339-b13a-1ac83d8a5fc0@s14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <4DC3E870.7D929774@elfavo.com> <iq1eu5$qlh$1@news.belwue.de> <4DC64BB1.77617120@elfavo.com> <iq65na$sjg$1@news.belwue.de>

Show all headers | View raw


Thomas Richter wrote:
> 
> So far, you haven't said anything, neither explained anything.

You wouldn't go to the apes in the zoo to carry on an intelligent
conversation, would you?
Look, I went to a similar invitation five years ago (the meeting
in Geneva) and tried to explain something, and the result was that
another mistake was introduced by your crowd.  I have tried to
prevent that mistake by warning the people who were in contact with
me, but the force from certain parties was so strong that nobody
kept reason.  So I went to other people who listened more carefully
and who were able to support my work so that I could get to the
results which are available now.  And this is only a fraction of
the potential that still has to be realized.  Something can be
found in the available meeting document, but afterwards even more
conclusions were found (like the mentioned second fundamental
theorem, and more), but they were obviously no more published in
the insane zoo neighborhood, but in a more fruitful environment.

> Which, actually, wasn't the question to begin with.
> The OP question was answered,

Yes, and that question was not answered by yours or Sebastians
theoretical explanations - it was answered by my straight
practical hints, because I know and understand the software he
(the OP) is working with.

> Science is driven by experiments and validation (or falsification),
> ...

Your understanding of science is as poor as your understanding of
image coding and DCT in particular, and that's why it will be very
difficult to carry on a fruitful conversation whith you guys.

You are under a major misapprehension to believe that you could
help me to gain some understanding how things work.
I know how things work in reality, and you are only speculating.
So it is you who needs to understand how things really work.
I have seen what you are doing, and that is fruitless for real
application.  It may help yourself, but not me and the work to
be done.  So that's why a conversation will be difficult:
we are just under opposite assumptions.

If you are still interested in a meeting, I could talk to my
people whether we should engage with you (we operate from
Switzerland and Germany, and Berlin is actually nearer to my
home than Geneva or Lausanne).
But note:  I have little interest in seeing your speculations,
and you would need to listen to the responsible person.
That is of course a learning process.
I was also ignorant some time before, so I understand your
position.  I had to find a master, a guru, who would enlighten
me, and that fortunately happened.
The question is whether you are prepared to get enlightened -
you are unfortunately in a position which is quite far away
from that blissful state, that's why I am sceptical.

However, there is really no need to see each other as enemies.
The term "Transformation" is nice - it does not only appear
as core of image coding, but also as core in the science of
enlightenment, where it is called the "Transformation of
Consciousness".
And I would have some very practical and acceptable suggestions
for you how we could transform your mistakes into useful features,
so that not all your effort would appear wasted - but again, this
requires careful attention and readiness from your side.

ciao
human

Back to comp.compression | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-05-03 13:32 +0300
  Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreply@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-03 13:53 +0200
    Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-05-03 16:09 +0100
      Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreply@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-03 18:10 +0200
        Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreply@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-03 18:32 +0200
  Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-03 06:22 -0700
    Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-05-03 18:03 +0300
      Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-05 04:18 -0700
        Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreply@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-05 13:35 +0200
          Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-06 00:23 -0700
            Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreply@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-06 14:24 +0200
              Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2011-05-06 20:33 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreply@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-08 09:52 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2011-05-08 15:27 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreply@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-08 17:55 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-08 07:56 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreply@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-08 18:44 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-08 10:21 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreply@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-09 10:51 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2011-05-09 11:49 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreply@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-09 12:06 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2011-05-09 15:29 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Guido Vollbeding <gv@uc.ag> - 2011-05-09 16:03 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-09 22:01 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2011-05-09 23:24 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-10 16:45 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 04:15 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-09 14:26 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2011-05-09 15:51 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-09 21:09 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2011-05-09 22:28 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-09 23:06 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2011-05-10 17:34 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-12 15:01 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 09:40 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-09 20:23 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2011-05-09 22:37 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-10 02:27 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-10 05:01 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-12 15:51 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-13 05:07 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-13 14:39 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-13 15:39 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-13 16:36 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-13 08:52 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-13 19:00 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-13 10:07 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-13 17:25 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-13 10:06 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Pete Fraser <pfraser@covad.net> - 2011-05-13 18:17 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Guido Vollbeding <guido@jpegclub.org> - 2011-05-14 09:16 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Guido Vollbeding <guido@jpegclub.org> - 2011-05-14 10:07 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Guido Vollbeding <guido@jpegclub.org> - 2011-05-14 19:52 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Guido Vollbeding <guido@jpegclub.org> - 2011-05-14 21:08 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Guido Vollbeding <guido@jpegclub.org> - 2011-05-16 08:43 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 05:15 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2011-05-16 17:00 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 13:02 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2011-05-17 09:43 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 02:55 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2011-05-20 13:23 +0200
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Pete Fraser <pfraser@covad.net> - 2011-05-20 05:38 -0700
                Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs human <noreplay@elfavo.com> - 2011-05-12 20:15 +0200

csiph-web