Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #59554
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-19 08:39 -0700 |
| References | <f25a1682-aaa8-4b25-add2-74950eed8731@googlegroups.com> <20170519015031.4394e19a@_> |
| Message-ID | <46354fee-7475-4e24-9bda-e1a9ea8bfdd7@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? |
| From | gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> |
On Friday, May 19, 2017 at 1:49:24 AM UTC-4, Rod Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, 18 May 2017 22:22:21 -0700 (PDT) > gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> wrote: > > > how would they communicate? > > They would communicate over ethernet like every modern computer. Why > do you think that using Forth software would change the hardware used? > > > Rod Pemberton > -- > "Well, many people are really f---ing stupid too. Should we just adopt > all their standards?" - George Carlin ok but how would I from say gforth see or program against the 39 other boxes? ..... or send commands and get data back?
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 22:22 -0700
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:28 +0300
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-05-19 01:50 -0400
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:54 +0300
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ilya Tarasov <ilya74.tarasov@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 02:38 -0700
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 12:47 +0300
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-05-19 07:50 -0500
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-05-20 04:31 -0400
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-05-20 04:02 -0500
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-05-19 01:50 -0400
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:39 -0700
Re: could you have a forth on linux on 40 machines and 1 hand work to 39? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2017-05-19 19:16 +0100
csiph-web