Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #154459
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 09:45 -0800 |
| References | (4 earlier) <20151105140806.3f09ee42a41bae33dc1b7668@eircom.net> <KYWdnWLCj_MbWqbLnZ2dnUU78bednZ2d@giganews.com> <proto-29B841.12571911112015@news.panix.com> <ePmdnRbNbIx9ft7LnZ2dnUU78c2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1511112328410.29647@darkstar.example.org> |
| Message-ID | <302df278-7a66-4e9a-8aec-fa65654069bb@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: HP split into two |
| From | hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com |
On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 11:30:42 PM UTC-5, Michael Black wrote: > I thought in the days of cloth ribbons for typewriters, they were either > all the same, or just a few types. There were actually quite a few types of ribbons for regular typewriters and not compatible, but it wasn't as crazy as it got for computer printers. Talk about forced obsolescence-- by discontinuing an ink cartridge, they make a printer worthless and one needs to buy a new printer. Forle, some people were buying bottled ink and using a syringe to inject the ink into a printer cartridge, thus getting twice or triple the life out of it at a much cheaper cost. If someone did a lot of printing, I could see the savings in doing that; even though it does seem like a messy pain. (I tried using bottled ink with a fountain pen. It was a lot cheaper than cartridges, but messy and a nuisance. There were some good reasons fountain pens fell from grace.) > But other electronic devices do it too. Lots of cordless phones have a > battery pack, and they all seem different from others. It comes as a > surprise to find some that use regular rechargeable batteries. I found a > nice 6mp camera with enough zoom, but the battery is dead and it's not > standard. So I can't even try the camera without spending money on it. I got a new simple cordless phone, same brand as my old unit. My old one had a headset jack in which I plugged in a cheap headset so I could drive and talk legally handsfree. but on the new phone the jack for the headset is slightly too big and won't work. Fortunately, I rarely drive and talk, but it would be nice to have the feature at times.
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
HP split into two jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2015-11-04 23:25 +0000
Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-04 18:36 -0500
Re: HP split into two Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-11-04 22:58 -0500
Re: HP split into two philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-11-05 05:16 -0600
Re: HP split into two David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-11-05 11:28 +0000
Re: HP split into two Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-11-05 11:44 +0000
Re: HP split into two David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-11-05 11:52 +0000
Re: HP split into two Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-11-06 09:40 -0800
Re: HP split into two scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-11-05 14:15 +0000
Re: HP split into two Uncle Steve <stevet810@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 07:48 -0500
Re: HP split into two "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-11-05 07:37 -0600
Re: HP split into two "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-05 13:50 +0000
Re: HP split into two Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2015-11-05 20:47 -0500
Re: HP split into two Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-05 14:08 +0000
Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-05 13:00 -0500
Re: HP split into two "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-05 18:44 +0000
Re: HP split into two hankvc@blackhole.lostwells.org (Hank) - 2015-11-08 18:03 +0000
Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-05 21:16 +0000
Re: HP split into two Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-11-06 08:02 +0000
Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 09:20 +0000
Re: HP split into two Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-11-06 09:53 +0000
Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 11:58 +0000
Re: HP split into two Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-11-06 15:19 +0000
Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 19:30 +0000
Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-06 15:54 -0500
Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 23:02 +0000
Re: HP split into two Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-11-07 10:35 +0000
Re: HP split into two jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-07 13:45 +0000
Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-07 13:59 +0000
Re: HP split into two jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-08 13:46 +0000
Re: HP split into two Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-05 21:19 +0000
Re: HP split into two Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-06 10:16 +0000
Re: HP split into two Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-11-06 17:22 +0000
Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 13:01 -0500
Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 12:58 -0500
Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 12:57 -0500
Re: HP split into two Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-12 00:57 +0000
Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-11 23:33 -0500
Re: HP split into two Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-12 13:49 +0000
Re: HP split into two Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2015-11-12 10:55 -0700
Re: HP split into two hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-11-13 09:45 -0800
Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-13 12:58 -0500
Re: HP split into two Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-14 06:20 +0000
Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 12:50 -0500
csiph-web