Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #154002

Re: HP split into two

From	"Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net>
Newsgroups	alt.folklore.computers
Subject	Re: HP split into two
Date	2015-11-05 07:37 -0600
Message-ID	<da14dbF2igjU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<n1e44d$r1e$1@reader1.panix.com> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1511041832030.14500@darkstar.example.org> <n1ek1t$h24$1@dont-email.me> <n1fdmj$rj2$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

"philo" wrote:

> I recall when they were known for their excellent test equipment.
>
>
> One of my friends worked there for many years...he wrote their printer 
> drivers.
>
> When he hit 60 though they got rid of him.
>
>
> He told me that HP once made products that no one else could make...and 
> now they just make products that no one else wants to bother with.

I remember opening up my new HP-35 and seeing the super flexible power cord 
and thinking, these are *real* engineers. Soft carrying case, hard carrying 
case, nice manual, RPN. It left all the competitors in the dust.  ISTR they 
had a nice monthly bulletin, their equivalent to the BSTJ. Circa 1976.  They 
described putting clocks in planes and flying them around the world to see 
if Einstein was right.

It's so sad.

Thread

HP split into two jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2015-11-04 23:25 +0000
  Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-04 18:36 -0500
    Re: HP split into two Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-11-04 22:58 -0500
      Re: HP split into two philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-11-05 05:16 -0600
        Re: HP split into two David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-11-05 11:28 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-11-05 11:44 +0000
            Re: HP split into two David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-11-05 11:52 +0000
            Re: HP split into two Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-11-06 09:40 -0800
          Re: HP split into two scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-11-05 14:15 +0000
            Re: HP split into two Uncle Steve <stevet810@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 07:48 -0500
        Re: HP split into two "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-11-05 07:37 -0600
          Re: HP split into two "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-05 13:50 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2015-11-05 20:47 -0500
        Re: HP split into two Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-05 14:08 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-05 13:00 -0500
            Re: HP split into two "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-05 18:44 +0000
              Re: HP split into two hankvc@blackhole.lostwells.org (Hank) - 2015-11-08 18:03 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-05 21:16 +0000
            Re: HP split into two Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-11-06 08:02 +0000
              Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 09:20 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-11-06 09:53 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 11:58 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-11-06 15:19 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 19:30 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-06 15:54 -0500
                Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 23:02 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-11-07 10:35 +0000
                Re: HP split into two jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-07 13:45 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-07 13:59 +0000
                Re: HP split into two jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-08 13:46 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-05 21:19 +0000
            Re: HP split into two Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-06 10:16 +0000
              Re: HP split into two Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-11-06 17:22 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 13:01 -0500
              Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 12:58 -0500
            Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 12:57 -0500
              Re: HP split into two Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-12 00:57 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-11 23:33 -0500
                Re: HP split into two Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-12 13:49 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2015-11-12 10:55 -0700
                Re: HP split into two hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-11-13 09:45 -0800
                Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-13 12:58 -0500
                Re: HP split into two Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-14 06:20 +0000
        Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 12:50 -0500

csiph-web