Re: Running Four Different OS's

From	Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.system
Subject	Re: Running Four Different OS's
Date	2014-12-28 17:29 +1300
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<281220141729465314%YourName@YourISP.com> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <251220140724295201%nospam@ny.more> <FuudnU7IOJtkvwHJnZ2dnUU7-X2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <261220141021311505%YourName@YourISP.com> <251220141824409831%nospam@ny.more> <m7nmua$1gg$1@solani.org>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <m7nmua$1gg$1@solani.org>, ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid>
wrote:
> M-M wrote:
> > System 7, 8 and 9 in Sheepshaver are _much_ faster than they ever were
> > in the old 68040's.
> 
> What about the PPC versions of 7.x, 8.x and 9.x? - I also thought this 
> until I got really familiar with the use of ResEdit. After this I 
> modified some of the OS 8.x and 9.x version - especially 8.6, 9.0.4, 9.1 
> and 9.2.x by allocating more internal memory to each and every possible 
> part of the systems.
> 
> This indeed increased both speed and performance. My 'monster' is a 
> completely modified OS 9.2.2 running bootable on a MDD 1,25ghz, but it 
> also swollows apprx. 140mb of memory to the system.:-) - Some app 
> versions are just as fast as the same versions on my MacPro1.1 - such as 
> AppleWorks 6.2.x, Freehand MX 11.x, Photoshop CS1, Canvas 8 and more...
> 
> And until today the 'Monster 9.2.2' has never had an unprovoked freeze 
> or breakdown...

Mac OS 8 / 9 is often as quick, if not quicker, at running the same
applications (including the Finder) than the early versions of Mac OS
X. That's because Mac OS X has a lot of silly overhead for processor
time like drop shadows, transparency, etc.

Thread

Running Four Different OS's M-M <nospam@ny.more> - 2014-12-23 23:35 -0500
  Re: Running Four Different OS's Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-12-24 18:23 +1300
  Re: Running Four Different OS's sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2014-12-24 05:23 +0000
    Re: Running Four Different OS's Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-12-25 00:15 +0000
  Re: Running Four Different OS's Chris Schram <chrispam1@me.com> - 2014-12-23 21:34 -0800
    Re: Running Four Different OS's Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-12-25 00:15 +0000
      Re: Running Four Different OS's M-M <nospam@ny.more> - 2014-12-24 20:46 -0500
        Re: Running Four Different OS's Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-12-24 22:54 -0800
          Re: Running Four Different OS's M-M <nospam@ny.more> - 2014-12-25 07:24 -0500
            Re: Running Four Different OS's Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-12-25 06:45 -0800
              Re: Running Four Different OS's Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-12-26 10:21 +1300
                Re: Running Four Different OS's M-M <nospam@ny.more> - 2014-12-25 18:24 -0500
                Re: Running Four Different OS's Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-12-26 13:58 +1300
                Re: Running Four Different OS's ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-12-28 02:38 +0100
                Re: Running Four Different OS's Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-12-28 17:29 +1300
                Re: Running Four Different OS's Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-12-26 08:52 -0500
  Re: Running Four Different OS's Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-12-24 07:39 -0500
  Re: Running Four Different OS's Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-12-24 06:22 -0800
  Re: Running Four Different OS's ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-12-28 02:20 +0100

csiph-web