Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #55155
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: Question about wildcards in Unix |
| Date | 2014-01-21 10:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <210120141023028671%timstreater@greenbee.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <nzvbxe4bhy.fsf@ethel.the.log> <52dd91ed$0$51443$c3e8da3$eb767761@news.astraweb.com> <8ffvoiz4n2.fsf@ethel.the.log> <200120141844429266%nospam@nospam.invalid> <htbnz6w4fw.fsf@ethel.the.log> |
In article <htbnz6w4fw.fsf@ethel.the.log>, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> writes: > > > In article <8ffvoiz4n2.fsf@ethel.the.log>, Doug Anderson > > <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > If it takes an hour to find out the correct invocation of a command, you > > > > might still call the shell powerfull, but is it usefull? > > > > > > The more powerful a tool is, the longer it generally takes to learn > > > how to use it fluently. > > > > not if it's designed well. > > A powerful tool designed well is harder to learn how to use than a > more limited tool designed well. A powerful tool designed well should be no harder to use for simple things than a simple tool that can only do those simple things. And if that is the case, the user is thereby encouraged to explore a bit and eventually learn to use the tool for more complex actions. > > powerful does not mean complicated. > > Correct. But as a rule tool that can do many different things is > going to be harder to understand and use than a tool that can just do > one thing. But it shouldn't be *that* much harder. > > in fact, it's the opposite. easy to use is when something is powerful > > because it empowers more people to be able to do more things, rather > > than throw up their hands and give up in frustration. > > The unix shell has empowered me to do a _lot_ of things. Tim threw up > his hands in frustration because he didn't actually need it - he had > other tools that were better suited. That's a good thing. There's quite a lot in TW that I don't use, and guess what, for the things that I do use it for, it behaves pretty identically to notepad, a much simpler tool. > w Which tool give you this? :-) -- Tim "That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" -- Bill of Rights 1689
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question about wildcards in Unix JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-01-19 17:19 -0500
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-01-19 14:42 -0800
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix Joanna Shuttleworth <js@example.com> - 2014-01-19 22:46 +0000
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-01-19 18:16 -0500
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-01-20 12:43 +1300
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-19 19:02 -0500
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-01-20 17:41 +1300
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-01-19 19:55 -0500
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-01-20 03:00 +0000
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix mcarels@xs4all.nl (Maarten Carels) - 2014-01-20 10:05 +0100
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-01-20 09:49 +0000
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-01-20 12:57 -0800
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-01-20 16:15 -0500
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-01-20 14:10 -0800
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-01-20 23:06 +0000
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-01-20 16:39 -0800
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-20 18:44 -0500
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-01-20 16:42 -0800
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-01-21 10:23 +0000
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-01-20 18:43 +0000
Re: Question about wildcards in Unix Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-01-20 12:55 -0800
csiph-web