Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #121930
| From | Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() |
| Date | 2025-03-10 14:26 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20250310142648.00005b3c@yahoo.com> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <20250309140932.0000303d@yahoo.com> <vqkf9p$qh6l$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <20250309200407.0000036c@yahoo.com> <vqm0id$17aku$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vqmcee$19g55$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> |
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:46:59 +0100
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried to use a unsigned __int128 / uint64_t division and I expected
> that the compiler calls a library function which does the subtract and
> shift manually. But g++ as well as clang++ handle this as a 128 : 64
> -> 64#64 division somehow.
Somehow?
It should be an obvious thing to anybody who cared to think for 15
seconds.
A library-or-compiler starts with hi1=rem(0:x_hi, y). Now hi1 is
guaranteed to be smaller than y, so it's safe to do rem(hi1:x_lo, y).
It is not *very* slow, but still there are 2 dependent division
operations.
So, on machines with slow integer division, like Skylake, it is 1.5-1.7
times slower than a single long division.
On machines with fast long division, like Zen3/4/5 or "performance"
cores on newer Intel CPUs, it is approximately twice slower than a
single long division. Plus call overhead, so 2.5x or so slower overall.
> And now my original solution is about 23% faster than your solution
> for close exponents (exponent difference <= 53) and for arbitrary
> exponent differences your solution is about 3% faster.
>
That's absolutely not what I see.
Here are my measurements:
Measurements in nsec.
First result - Intel Skylake at 4.25 GHz
Second result - AMD Zen3 at 3.7 GHz
abs(x/y) in range that matters [0.5:2**53]:
Standard MSVC Library - 11.1 10.4
Standard gnu Library - 5.4 10.7
Yours (MSVc) - 27.6 11.5
Yours (gcc) - 36.4 23.7
Yours (clang) - 37.4 24.3
my (MSVc) - 10.7 11.3
my (gcc) - 7.7 7.6
my (clang) - 6.3 7.5
Your last (MSVc) - 27.6 11.6
Your last (gcc) - 33.8 28.6
Your last (clang) - 32.6 26.9
abs(x/y) in full range [2**-2090:2**2090]:
Standard MSVC Library - 109.4 153.5
Standard glib Library - 102.3 155.5
Yours (MSVc) - 134.9 52.6
Yours (gcc) - 284.7 151.8
Yours (clang) - 285.2 156.5
my (MSVc) - 62.1 61.1
my (gcc) - 60.8 59.1
my (clang) - 59.9 59.3
Your last (MSVc) - 135.0 52.5
Your last (gcc) - 172.1 137.3
Your last (clang) - 167.7 126.3
It looks like you are not using version that I posted at 2025-03-03
as a reference.
The only case where you code is running at approximately the same speed
as my code is MSVC-generated code on CPUs with fast integer division.
And it was like that since your previous version. I see no changes in
that regard.
> double fmodO( double x, double y )
> {
> constexpr uint64_t
> SIGN = 1ull << 63,
> IMPLICIT = 1ull << 52,
> MANT = IMPLICIT - 1,
> QBIT = 1ull << 51;
> uint64_t const
> binX = bit_cast<uint64_t>( x ),
> binY = bit_cast<uint64_t>( y );
> static auto abs = []( uint64_t m ) { return m & ~SIGN; };
> auto isNaN = []( uint64_t m ) { return abs( m ) >=
> 0x7FF0000000000001u; }; auto isSig = []( uint64_t m ) { return !(m &
> QBIT); }; if( isNaN( binX ) ) [[unlikely]] // x == NaN
> #if defined(_MSC_VER)
> return bit_cast<double>( isNaN( binY ) ? binY | binX
> & binY & QBIT : binX );
> #else
> {
> if( isSig( binX ) || isNaN( binY ) && isSig( binY ) )
> [[unlikely]] feraiseexcept( FE_INVALID );
> return bit_cast<double>( binX | QBIT );
> }
> #endif
> if( isNaN( binY ) ) [[unlikely]] // x != NaN || y == NaN
> #if defined(_MSC_VER)
> return y;
> #else
> {
> if( isSig( binY ) ) [[unlikely]]
> feraiseexcept( FE_INVALID );
> return bit_cast<double>( binY | QBIT );
> }
> #endif
> auto isInf = []( uint64_t m ) { return abs( m ) ==
> 0x7FF0000000000000u; }; if( isInf( binX ) ) // x == Inf
> {
> feraiseexcept( FE_INVALID );
> #if defined(_MSC_VER)
> return bit_cast<double>( binX & ~MANT | QBIT );
> #else
> return -numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN();
> #endif
> }
> if( !abs( binY ) ) [[unlikely]] // y == 0
> {
> feraiseexcept( FE_INVALID );
> #if defined(_MSC_VER)
> return numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN();
> #else
> return -numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN();
> #endif
> }
> if( !abs( binX ) || isInf( binY ) ) [[unlikely]] // x == 0 ||
> y == Inf return x;
> auto exp = []( uint64_t b ) -> int { return b >> 52 & 0x7FF;
> }; int
> expX = exp( binX ),
> expY = exp( binY );
> auto mant = []( uint64_t b ) { return b & MANT; };
> uint64_t
> mantX = mant( binX ),
> mantY = mant( binY );
> int headBits = 11;
> static auto normalize = [&]( int &exp, uint64_t &mant )
> {
> unsigned shift = countl_zero( mant ) - headBits;
> mant <<= shift;
> exp -= shift;
> };
> auto build = []( int &exp, uint64_t &mant )
> {
> if( exp ) [[likely]]
> mant |= IMPLICIT;
> else
> {
> exp = 1;
> normalize( exp, mant );
> }
> };
> build( expX, mantX );
> build( expY, mantY );
> int
> tailX = countr_zero( mantX ),
> tailY = countr_zero( mantY ),
> tailBits = tailX <= tailY ? tailX : tailY;
> mantX >>= tailBits;
> mantY >>= tailBits;
> headBits += tailBits;
> uint64_t signX = binX & SIGN;
> int expDiff;
> #if defined(_MSC_VER) && !defined(__llvm__) && defined(_M_X64)
> while( (expDiff = expX - expY) > 0 )
> {
> unsigned bits = expDiff <= 63 ? expDiff : 63;
> unsigned long long hi = mantX >> 64 - bits, lo =
> mantX << bits, remainder; (void)_udiv128( hi, lo, mantY, &remainder );
> if( !remainder ) [[unlikely]]
> return bit_cast<double>( signX );
> mantX = remainder;
> expX -= bits;
> normalize( expX, mantX );
> }
> #elif defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__clang__)
> while( (expDiff = expX - expY) > 0 )
> {
> unsigned bits = expDiff <= 63 ? expDiff : 63;
> unsigned __int128 dividend = (unsigned __int128)mantX
> << bits; mantX = (uint64_t)(dividend % mantY);
> if( !mantX ) [[unlikely]]
> return bit_cast<double>( signX );
> expX -= bits;
> normalize( expX, mantX );
> }
> #else
> while( (expDiff = expX - expY) > 0 )
> {
> unsigned bits = expDiff <= headBits ? expDiff :
> headBits; if( !(mantX = (mantX << bits) % mantY) ) [[unlikely]]
> return bit_cast<double>( signX );
> expX -= bits;
> normalize( expX, mantX );
> }
> #endif
> if( !expDiff && mantX >= mantY ) [[unlikely]]
> if( (mantX -= mantY) ) [[likely]]
> normalize( expX, mantX );
> else
> return bit_cast<double>( signX );
> mantX <<= tailBits;
> mantY <<= tailBits;
> if( expX <= 0 ) [[unlikely]]
> {
> assert(expX >= -51);
> mantX = mantX >> (unsigned)(-expX + 1);
> expX = 0;
> }
> return bit_cast<double>( signX | (uint64_t)expX << 52 | mantX
> & MANT ); }
You code would be much, much cleaner and more readable if you replace
lambdas with proper functions. Or just write simple expressions like 'x
& MANT' in place.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 11:48 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-24 12:00 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 13:48 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-24 13:09 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 14:22 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-24 17:13 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 16:19 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-24 17:52 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 09:09 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 16:17 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-25 17:26 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 16:45 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 16:57 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-25 19:17 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 18:58 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-26 00:36 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 04:15 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-26 08:16 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-26 14:27 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-26 14:39 +0000
FP_CONTRACT was : a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-28 16:28 +0200
Re: FP_CONTRACT was : a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-01 08:35 -0800
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-24 16:22 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-24 15:10 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-24 17:33 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-24 16:48 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-24 22:21 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 07:37 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-25 23:03 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-26 02:00 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Wuns Haerst <Wuns.Haerst@wurstfabrik.at> - 2025-02-26 04:01 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-25 08:24 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-27 21:16 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 07:59 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-28 12:35 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-28 18:12 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 19:23 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-28 18:30 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 19:31 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-28 19:47 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 20:49 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-03-01 14:37 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 16:58 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-03-01 17:11 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 21:02 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-03-01 20:32 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 21:37 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-03-01 20:45 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 09:40 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-01 22:55 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 18:54 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 17:59 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 15:41 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 17:10 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-03-02 16:22 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 17:26 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 19:07 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 18:09 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 18:11 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 19:52 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 18:55 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 20:09 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 19:14 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 19:57 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 22:58 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 12:52 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-03 18:10 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-03 23:55 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-07 09:51 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-03 18:20 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 17:30 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-03 19:27 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 18:39 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-03 02:01 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 19:37 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 18:41 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 20:00 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 19:01 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 01:31 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 07:41 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 11:08 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 10:31 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 11:46 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 10:54 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 12:09 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 11:21 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 14:09 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-03-09 15:26 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 17:02 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 19:55 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 19:10 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 19:27 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 17:23 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 20:04 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 19:11 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 20:11 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 07:24 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 10:46 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 14:26 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 13:45 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 16:33 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 15:46 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 16:59 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 16:11 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 17:43 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 17:13 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 19:51 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 19:00 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 20:38 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 22:34 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 22:36 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 12:47 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 23:52 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 23:57 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 09:34 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 12:29 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 12:12 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 13:34 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 13:10 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 14:55 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 14:08 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 15:46 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 13:51 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-11 14:21 -0400
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 20:28 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-16 13:48 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 13:17 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 12:53 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 12:54 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 18:51 +0800
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 12:56 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 14:23 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 13:39 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 14:56 +0200
csiph-web