Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #121932
| From | Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() |
| Date | 2025-03-10 16:33 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20250310163304.000029bf@yahoo.com> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <20250309200407.0000036c@yahoo.com> <vqm0id$17aku$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vqmcee$19g55$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <20250310142648.00005b3c@yahoo.com> <vqmmt1$1bjh1$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> |
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:45:26 +0100 Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> wrote: > Am 10.03.2025 um 13:26 schrieb Michael S: > > > It should be an obvious thing to anybody who cared to think for 15 > > seconds. > > I was wrong and it absolutels isn't obvious. The compiler calls the > glibc function __umodti3 of glibc which has a shortcut for results > which fit into 64 bit. Although there's an additional call on Linux > the code with clang++-18 is still a bit faster than my Windows > solution with the _udiv128-intrinsic; that's really surprisng. > > > A library-or-compiler starts with hi1=rem(0:x_hi, y). Now hi1 is > > guaranteed to be smaller than y, so it's safe to do rem(hi1:x_lo, > > y). It is not *very* slow, but still there are 2 dependent division > > operations. > > Both parameters are variable so there could be no static evaluation > at compile tiime. > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/udivmodti4.c On line 114 they specialize the case of 64-bit divisor. On line 116 the further specialize our specific case of x.hi < y. So, at the end they use the same single division instruction as MSVC. The only difference is an overhead of cal and of to very predictable branches. > > Measurements in nsec. > > First result - Intel Skylake at 4.25 GHz > > Second result - AMD Zen3 at 3.7 GHz > > > > abs(x/y) in range that matters [0.5:2**53]: > > Standard MSVC Library - 11.1 10.4 > > Standard gnu Library - 5.4 10.7 > > Yours (MSVc) - 27.6 11.5 > > Yours (gcc) - 36.4 23.7 > > Yours (clang) - 37.4 24.3 > > my (MSVc) - 10.7 11.3 > > my (gcc) - 7.7 7.6 > > my (clang) - 6.3 7.5 > > Your last (MSVc) - 27.6 11.6 > > Your last (gcc) - 33.8 28.6 > > Your last (clang) - 32.6 26.9 > > > > abs(x/y) in full range [2**-2090:2**2090]: > > Standard MSVC Library - 109.4 153.5 > > Standard glib Library - 102.3 155.5 > > Yours (MSVc) - 134.9 52.6 > > Yours (gcc) - 284.7 151.8 > > Yours (clang) - 285.2 156.5 > > my (MSVc) - 62.1 61.1 > > my (gcc) - 60.8 59.1 > > my (clang) - 59.9 59.3 > > Your last (MSVc) - 135.0 52.5 > > Your last (gcc) - 172.1 137.3 > > Your last (clang) - 167.7 126.3 > > This are the clang++-18 results on my Zen4-computer under WSL2 with > close exponents (0x3ff to 0x433): > > fmodO: 9.42929 > fmodM: 11.7907 For my code it's strangely slow. On 4+ GHz Zen4 I would expect ~5 nsec. Are you sure that you took my code from 2025-03-03 as is, compiled it as separate file C file (not C++), without touching it? > > So my code is about 23% faster on my computer. > > This are the results for arbitrary exponents: > > fmodO: 41.9115 > fmodM: 41.2062 Good job by LLVM. Unfortunately, on msys2 clang appears to use Gnu implementation of compiler support library instead of their own. Right now gnu is not as smart. Hopefully, they will catch up soon. > > Exactly what I already mentioned. > > Maybe that depends on the glibc-version because a different glibc > version might have different efficient __umodti3 functions. > Compiler supports functions like udivmodti4 are not part of glibc. They reside in separate library. In case of gcc it is called libgcc or libgcc_s. My educated guess is that on Linux clang does not use libgcc. > > You code would be much, much cleaner and more readable if you > > replace lambdas with proper functions. .. > > For me that doesn't make a difference. But it makes difference for your potential readers.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 11:48 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-24 12:00 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 13:48 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-24 13:09 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 14:22 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-24 17:13 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 16:19 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-24 17:52 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 09:09 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 16:17 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-25 17:26 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 16:45 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 16:57 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-25 19:17 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 18:58 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-26 00:36 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 04:15 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-26 08:16 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-26 14:27 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-26 14:39 +0000
FP_CONTRACT was : a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-28 16:28 +0200
Re: FP_CONTRACT was : a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-01 08:35 -0800
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-24 16:22 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-24 15:10 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-24 17:33 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-24 16:48 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-24 22:21 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 07:37 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-25 23:03 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-26 02:00 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Wuns Haerst <Wuns.Haerst@wurstfabrik.at> - 2025-02-26 04:01 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-25 08:24 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-27 21:16 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 07:59 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-28 12:35 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-28 18:12 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 19:23 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-28 18:30 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 19:31 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-28 19:47 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 20:49 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-03-01 14:37 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 16:58 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-03-01 17:11 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 21:02 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-03-01 20:32 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 21:37 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-03-01 20:45 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 09:40 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-01 22:55 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 18:54 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 17:59 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 15:41 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 17:10 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-03-02 16:22 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 17:26 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 19:07 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 18:09 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 18:11 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 19:52 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 18:55 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 20:09 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 19:14 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 19:57 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 22:58 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 12:52 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-03 18:10 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-03 23:55 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-07 09:51 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-03 18:20 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 17:30 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-03 19:27 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 18:39 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-03 02:01 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 19:37 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 18:41 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 20:00 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 19:01 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 01:31 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 07:41 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 11:08 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 10:31 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 11:46 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 10:54 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 12:09 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 11:21 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 14:09 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-03-09 15:26 +0000
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 17:02 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 19:55 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 19:10 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 19:27 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 17:23 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 20:04 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 19:11 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 20:11 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 07:24 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 10:46 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 14:26 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 13:45 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 16:33 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 15:46 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 16:59 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 16:11 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 17:43 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 17:13 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 19:51 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 19:00 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 20:38 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 22:34 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 22:36 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 12:47 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 23:52 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 23:57 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 09:34 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 12:29 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 12:12 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 13:34 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 13:10 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 14:55 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 14:08 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 15:46 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 13:51 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-11 14:21 -0400
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 20:28 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-16 13:48 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 13:17 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 12:53 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 12:54 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 18:51 +0800
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 12:56 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 14:23 +0200
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 13:39 +0100
Re: a MSVC and glibc-compatible fmod() Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 14:56 +0200
csiph-web