Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #54201

Re: TO implementation

From anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: TO implementation
Date 2017-01-20 12:20 +0000
Organization Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID <2017Jan20.132002@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <nMCdneVL4t5KU-bFnZ2dnUU7-evNnZ2d@supernews.com> <20170115221901.6a57e261@_> <2017Jan19.122645@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <20170119204949.1f41c0ee@_> <09fcb1a6-6d5b-4d0d-b22b-e2498229966d@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


minforth@arcor.de writes:
>Am Freitag, 20. Januar 2017 02:49:05 UTC+1 schrieb Rod Pemberton:
>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:26:45 GMT
>> anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) wrote:
>> 
>> > So, it may work for VFX or it may not work for some cases even there,
>> > but it does not say anything about the necessity of STATE for
>> > implementing SYNONYM.  E.g., here is the current implementation of
>> > SYNONYM on Gforth:
>> > 
>> > : Synonym ( "name" "oldname" -- ) \ Forth200x
>> >     Header  ['] on vtcopy
>> >     parse-name find-name dup A,
>> >     dup compile-only? IF  compile-only  THEN  name>int lastcfa !
>> >     ['] s>int set->int ['] s>comp set->comp ['] s-to set-to reveal ;
>> > 
>> > Look, Rod, no STATE.
>> >
>> 
>> That is clearly free of explicit use of STATE, but not necessarily
>> independent of indirect use of STATE via another Forth word executed
>> from SYNONYM, e.g., perhaps via set->comp.  STATE is core and must be
>> set during compilation.  Is STATE being set during compilation here?
>> STATE is core and should be.  Gforth would need to set STATE somewhere
>> during execution of SYNONYM, either directly or indirectly, to be in
>> compliance.  If STATE is being set for compilation, then SYNONYM is not
>> independent of STATE and usage of STATE is just being hidden by behind
>> another Forth word.  If I display STATE after each and every word in
>> SYNONYM, will I see the value of STATE change?  If not, does STATE's
>> value change at some point during the execution of SYNONYM?  If not,
>> why not?
>> 
>> 
>> Rod Pemberton
>
>Phew ... and rolling eyes. KISS, that is not.  ;-)

Right, the author of this code has a penchant for (too?) clever
optimizations.

>When you have dual-xt headers SYNONYM is just a header copy with another name.

Yes, that would be a straightforward way, given an appropriate header
implementation.  But one goal of the header organization that gave us
the code above is to have nt=xt, at least for ordinary words.  So with
this header organization, if you just copy all the fields, you get a
word with another copy of the body, which is not so great for words
with state in the body, such as CREATEd words, VALUEs, VARIABLEs, or
DEFERred words.

So what happens in the SYNONYM implementation above:

    Header

First an header stub for newname is created

    ['] on vtcopy

The header implementation is inspired by prototype-based
object-oriented systems, so this code sets up to behave like a colon
definition by using ON (a colon definition) as a prototype.

    parse-name find-name dup A,

This gets the nt of oldname and stores it in the place where the code
field would be in a normal word.

    dup compile-only? IF  compile-only  THEN  name>int lastcfa !

This copies the compile-only flag from oldname to newname, and sets
lastcfa to point to the interpretation semantics xt of oldname.

    ['] s>int set->int

This sets the behaviour of NAME>INTERPRET to be S>INT, and S>INT
fetches the contents of the code field (i.e., the nt of oldname) and
then performs NAME>INTERPRET for oldname.

    ['] s>comp set->comp

Likewise for NAME>COMPILE.

    ['] s-to set-to

This sets the TO behaviour to access the nt of oldname and then
perform the to behaviour of oldname.

    reveal ;

This makes the newname header visible.

Concerning Rod Pemberton's claims about STATE: No, none of these words
calls STATE; that would serve no useful purpose, and if it called
STATE, that would likely be a bug. 

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2016: http://www.euroforth.org/ef16/

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Nathan Schulzke <nschulzke@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 09:25 -0800
  Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Nathan Schulzke <nschulzke@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 09:30 -0800
    Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set trans <transfire@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 10:23 -0800
      Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Nathan Schulzke <nschulzke@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 16:37 -0800
        Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-12-09 17:01 -0800
          Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Nathan Schulzke <nschulzke@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 09:07 -0800
          Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-01-01 21:40 -0500
            Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-01-01 21:06 -1000
              Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-03 17:22 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-01-04 10:09 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set john <anon@example.com> - 2017-01-04 11:59 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-04 10:56 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-04 23:58 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-04 20:06 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-01-05 04:12 -0600
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-05 12:43 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-05 16:38 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-05 19:17 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-05 18:26 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-06 01:56 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-07 15:53 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-07 18:20 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-08 16:33 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-08 20:02 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-09 17:53 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-09 20:22 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set minforth@arcor.de - 2017-01-09 08:04 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-09 17:04 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-09 20:22 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-10 01:41 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set minforth@arcor.de - 2017-01-09 22:16 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-10 09:44 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-10 15:19 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-10 15:24 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-10 15:35 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-10 22:12 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-10 22:42 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-11 00:23 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-10 23:35 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set minforth@arcor.de - 2017-01-10 23:38 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-11 10:32 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-11 12:52 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-11 13:23 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set minforth@arcor.de - 2017-01-11 06:08 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-11 14:39 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2017-01-11 23:00 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-12 13:55 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-12 14:06 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2017-01-13 06:29 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-13 14:52 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-14 12:23 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-12 15:47 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-12 15:09 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-12 20:23 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-12 21:21 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-13 03:45 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-01-13 02:55 -0600
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-13 14:29 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Bernd Linsel <bl1@gmx.com> - 2017-01-13 16:11 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-13 17:26 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-13 17:27 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-13 17:01 +0000
                nt=xt? (was: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-14 15:35 +0000
                Re: nt=xt? (was: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set) stephen@mpeforth.com - 2017-01-14 13:58 -0800
                Re: nt=xt? (was: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-14 14:52 -0800
                Re: nt=xt? (was: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-15 14:00 +0000
                Re: nt=xt? (was: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set) albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-15 16:51 +0100
                Re: nt=xt? (was: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-15 16:04 +0000
                Re: nt=xt? (was: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-15 13:47 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-14 12:39 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Matthias Trute <matthias.trute@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 22:14 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-14 13:45 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2017-01-14 08:51 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set minforth@arcor.de - 2017-01-14 09:23 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-14 18:02 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 23:42 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-10 09:36 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2017-01-10 03:55 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-10 13:40 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2017-01-10 06:40 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-05 12:45 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Ilya Tarasov <ilya74.tarasov@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 08:19 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-06 17:57 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set mhx@iae.nl - 2017-01-08 01:34 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set john <anon@example.com> - 2017-01-08 17:08 +0000
            Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-02 16:49 +0000
    Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-12-09 14:52 -0800
    Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-09 14:56 -0800
  Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 13:13 -0800
  Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set minforth@arcor.de - 2017-01-06 06:58 -0800
    Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-01-06 09:32 -0600
      Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set minforth@arcor.de - 2017-01-06 09:11 -0800
        Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-01-06 12:41 -0600
          Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-01-06 21:31 -1000
            Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-07 13:28 -0800
              Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 23:00 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-07 14:37 -0800
              Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-08 00:06 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-07 18:50 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-08 14:28 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 19:34 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-09 06:27 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-10 00:08 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-10 10:01 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-10 13:12 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set stephen@mpeforth.com - 2017-01-08 07:23 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 19:41 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-09 17:41 +0000
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-01-07 18:56 -1000
          TO implementation (was: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-07 14:02 +0000
            Re: TO implementation Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-01-07 10:51 -0600
              Re: TO implementation anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-08 15:27 +0000
                Re: TO implementation Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-01-08 13:36 -0600
                Re: TO implementation anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-09 18:20 +0000
                Re: TO implementation Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-01-10 03:56 -0600
                Re: TO implementation anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-15 15:15 +0000
                Re: TO implementation Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-01-15 13:34 -0600
                Re: TO implementation hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-15 14:04 -0800
                Re: TO implementation stephen@mpeforth.com - 2017-01-15 14:24 -0800
                Re: TO implementation hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-15 15:42 -0800
                Re: TO implementation hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-15 15:56 -0800
                Re: TO implementation awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-16 14:25 +0100
                Re: TO implementation hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-16 11:30 -0800
                Re: TO implementation awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-17 02:00 +0100
                Re: TO implementation albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-17 12:59 +0100
                Re: TO implementation awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-17 14:38 +0100
                Re: TO implementation anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-17 15:47 +0000
                Re: TO implementation hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 10:24 -0800
                Re: TO implementation hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-16 17:02 -0800
                Re: TO implementation awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-17 06:00 +0100
                Re: TO implementation Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-01-15 22:19 -0500
                Re: TO implementation Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-01-16 08:57 -0600
                Re: TO implementation anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-19 11:26 +0000
                Re: TO implementation Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-01-19 20:49 -0500
                Re: TO implementation minforth@arcor.de - 2017-01-20 00:27 -0800
                Re: TO implementation anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-20 12:20 +0000
                Re: TO implementation Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2017-01-26 22:42 -0500
                Re: TO implementation anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-27 08:33 +0000
                Re: TO implementation minforth@arcor.de - 2017-01-27 03:59 -0800
                Re: TO implementation anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-19 11:40 +0000
                Re: TO implementation Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-01-19 05:55 -0600
                Re: TO implementation anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-19 14:46 +0000
                Re: TO implementation Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-01-19 11:03 -0600
        Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-06 20:22 +0100
          Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-01-07 03:54 -0600
          Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-07 13:51 +0000
            Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-07 18:50 +0100
              Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set mhx@iae.nl - 2017-01-08 02:05 -0800
    Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-06 17:41 +0100
      Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set minforth@arcor.de - 2017-01-06 09:15 -0800
        Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-06 18:40 +0100
          Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-06 20:25 +0100
            Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-07 14:55 +0100
              Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-07 18:55 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-07 19:10 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-08 01:25 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-08 02:17 +0100
            Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set mhx@iae.nl - 2017-01-08 01:53 -0800
              Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-08 17:03 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 17:51 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-08 18:30 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-08 10:51 -0800
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-08 20:06 +0100
          Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-07 15:31 +0000
            Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-07 18:20 +0100
              Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-07 18:56 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-07 19:10 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-01-08 01:26 +0100
                Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2017-01-08 02:06 +0100
    Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-01-06 17:23 -0800
    Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-01-07 15:37 +0000

csiph-web