Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #52147

Re: Is win32forth dead ?

From anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Is win32forth dead ?
Date 2016-10-24 11:37 +0000
Organization Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID <2016Oct24.133711@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
References <MPG.3277f5904f2c644d98969c@news.virginmedia.com>

Show all headers | View raw


jim <anon@example.com> writes:
>I'd 
>really like to have a free forth to use in case others want to help with what I'm 
>doing.

In that case Gforth may be your best option; I don't know if it has
the features you want, though.

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2016: http://www.euroforth.org/ef16/

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-24 11:40 +0100
  Re: Is win32forth dead ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-24 11:37 +0000
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-24 14:08 +0100
  Re: Is win32forth dead ? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-24 16:18 +0200
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-10-24 20:37 +0100
      Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-24 22:40 +0100
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-24 22:34 +0100
  Re: Is win32forth dead ? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 20:37 -0700
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-25 11:28 +0100
      Re: Is win32forth dead ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 10:58 -0400
        Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-25 20:40 +0100
          Re: Is win32forth dead ? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-25 14:47 -0500
          Re: Is win32forth dead ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 12:44 -0400
            Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-26 22:11 +0100
  Re: Is win32forth dead ? josv@planet.nl - 2016-10-25 03:14 -0700
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-25 15:21 +0100
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 11:07 -0400
      Re: Is win32forth dead ? josv@planet.nl - 2016-10-25 09:02 -0700
        Re: Is win32forth dead ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 22:40 -0400
          Re: Is win32forth dead ? josv@planet.nl - 2016-10-27 05:51 -0700
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-26 14:35 +0100
      Re: Is win32forth dead ? josv@planet.nl - 2016-10-26 11:26 -0700
        Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-26 22:08 +0100

csiph-web