Re: Is win32forth dead ?

From	Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Is win32forth dead ?
Date	2016-10-25 14:47 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<nuocr7$kdq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<MPG.3277f5904f2c644d98969c@news.virginmedia.com> <df21f07f-32f7-490f-9106-32fdd95abb40@googlegroups.com> <MPG.3279440ee16651a39896a0@news.virginmedia.com> <nunru2$jbg$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.3279c5a4da539de19896a2@news.virginmedia.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/25/2016 2:40 PM, jim wrote:
> In article <nunru2$jbg$1@dont-email.me>, gnuarm@gmail.com says...
>>
>> What is a 64 bit FPGA?  FPGAs are word size agnostic.  You can have a 63
>> bit design in an FPGA or a 1 bit design.  Converting to an ASIC
>> shouldn't be an issue in either case.
>>
>
> Not with what I'm doing.
> You can have what you want if you're willing to be extremely wasteful
> of course - but you can't do this. and no I'm not explaining what "this" is.
>
>
>
>
So why are you here?

-- 
Cecil - k5nwa

Thread

Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-24 11:40 +0100
  Re: Is win32forth dead ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-24 11:37 +0000
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-24 14:08 +0100
  Re: Is win32forth dead ? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-24 16:18 +0200
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-10-24 20:37 +0100
      Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-24 22:40 +0100
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-24 22:34 +0100
  Re: Is win32forth dead ? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 20:37 -0700
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-25 11:28 +0100
      Re: Is win32forth dead ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 10:58 -0400
        Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-25 20:40 +0100
          Re: Is win32forth dead ? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-25 14:47 -0500
          Re: Is win32forth dead ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 12:44 -0400
            Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-26 22:11 +0100
  Re: Is win32forth dead ? josv@planet.nl - 2016-10-25 03:14 -0700
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-25 15:21 +0100
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 11:07 -0400
      Re: Is win32forth dead ? josv@planet.nl - 2016-10-25 09:02 -0700
        Re: Is win32forth dead ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 22:40 -0400
          Re: Is win32forth dead ? josv@planet.nl - 2016-10-27 05:51 -0700
    Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-26 14:35 +0100
      Re: Is win32forth dead ? josv@planet.nl - 2016-10-26 11:26 -0700
        Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-26 22:08 +0100

csiph-web