Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #52162
| From | Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Is win32forth dead ? |
| Date | 2016-10-24 20:37 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nulnt5$bfa$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <MPG.3277f5904f2c644d98969c@news.virginmedia.com> <nul57l$ab3$1@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl> |
On 24/10/2016 15:18, Albert van der Horst wrote: > In article<MPG.3277f5904f2c644d98969c@news.virginmedia.com>, > jim<anon@example.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> >I've looked around for a forth to do some prototype development with and settled >> >on win32forth as the only one trying to do a decent development environment >> >that has some feaures I want to use. > If you're looking for Eclipse you will not find it. Forthers here have > argued that one can get work done, without things like Eclipse. > >> > Sure you can do without Eclipse but I use Eclipse all the time with my Forth system running under Windows, it's good. It works just as well with Gforth, SwiftForth, VFX, Win32 Forth etc. I've got it set up so that a double click launches the selected Forth system, loads the application, runs a test program or whatever. It's more than fast enough. I've no wish to return to the old ways. -- Gerry
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-24 11:40 +0100
Re: Is win32forth dead ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-24 11:37 +0000
Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-24 14:08 +0100
Re: Is win32forth dead ? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-24 16:18 +0200
Re: Is win32forth dead ? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-10-24 20:37 +0100
Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-24 22:40 +0100
Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-24 22:34 +0100
Re: Is win32forth dead ? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 20:37 -0700
Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-25 11:28 +0100
Re: Is win32forth dead ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 10:58 -0400
Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-25 20:40 +0100
Re: Is win32forth dead ? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-25 14:47 -0500
Re: Is win32forth dead ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 12:44 -0400
Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-26 22:11 +0100
Re: Is win32forth dead ? josv@planet.nl - 2016-10-25 03:14 -0700
Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-25 15:21 +0100
Re: Is win32forth dead ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 11:07 -0400
Re: Is win32forth dead ? josv@planet.nl - 2016-10-25 09:02 -0700
Re: Is win32forth dead ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 22:40 -0400
Re: Is win32forth dead ? josv@planet.nl - 2016-10-27 05:51 -0700
Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-26 14:35 +0100
Re: Is win32forth dead ? josv@planet.nl - 2016-10-26 11:26 -0700
Re: Is win32forth dead ? jim <anon@example.com> - 2016-10-26 22:08 +0100
csiph-web