Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #158060
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: recommended free email? |
| Date | 2016-01-28 21:47 +0000 |
| Organization | Piglet's Pickles & Preserves |
| Message-ID | <dgvgkeF8q36U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <6edfabde5c14e81jbd7ksva2svj1r2iud3@4ax.com> <n88dv9$bhr$2@dont-email.me> <89udnQTIOefArjTLnZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <1be10a18-43e9-4c29-9cea-7d8bf7189257@googlegroups.com> <n8dvbp01gnd@news4.newsguy.com> |
On 2016-01-28, Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
> On 2016-01-28, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 4:15:11 PM UTC-5, Jon Elson wrote:
>>
>>> Right, the whole concept of Windows is run any script, program, screensaver
>>> or installer that comes in on an image file, email, web page or whatever.
>>> What idiocy!
>>
>> Yes, indeed.
>>
>> Going into manual mode is a pain in the $##$.
>>
>> I'm learning that Google does the same thing--highly automated, even
>> when one doesn't want it to be. Going into manual mode is a PITA.
>
> I've noticed more and more that the problem with modern gadgets and
> software is not in getting them to do what you want, but in preventing
> them from doing what you don't want.
Stallman was right.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/keep-control-of-your-computing.en.html
--
Today is Pungenday, the 28th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3182
I don't have an attitude problem.
If you have a problem with my attitude, that's your problem.
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-22 10:16 -0800
Re: recommended free email? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 12:59 -0600
Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-22 19:05 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-22 14:23 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-22 13:32 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-22 20:31 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-22 17:10 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-22 19:09 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-22 15:45 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-22 21:19 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-01-22 14:49 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-23 04:58 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-22 22:52 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 14:57 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-27 21:47 +0000
Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-23 12:58 +1100
Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-23 10:57 -0500
Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-23 16:49 +0000
Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 04:42 +1100
Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-23 20:24 +0000
Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 04:34 +1100
Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:00 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-27 17:22 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-28 11:46 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:36 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-31 11:03 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-31 17:29 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 09:25 +0000
Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:31 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-23 13:54 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 14:58 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-23 15:35 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 16:04 +0000
Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-23 16:42 +0000
Re: recommended free email? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 13:39 -0500
Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 00:43 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-24 10:56 +0000
Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 16:27 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-24 16:34 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-24 11:53 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2016-01-25 08:22 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 11:25 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-25 13:32 +0100
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 11:21 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-25 14:18 +0000
Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-25 09:54 -0800
Re: recommended free email? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 13:56 -0600
Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 08:10 -0800
Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:07 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 13:32 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:15 -0600
Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-28 10:33 -0800
Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-28 20:57 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-28 21:47 +0000
Re: recommended free email? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-02-06 20:20 +0300
Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-28 20:50 +0000
Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 11:06 -0800
Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-26 16:13 -0600
Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:32 -0600
Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:20 -0600
Re: recommended free email? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 19:19 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-25 15:45 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 22:24 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:11 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 18:14 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-23 18:42 +0000
csiph-web