Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.california > #286222

Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER?

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka 
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), 
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.x9ss01pitm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:59:23 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.x9p1t1h4tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:19:15 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> File datestamps can easily be manipulated, embedded date and time
>>>> stamps, not so easily without being detected.

>>> those would ALSO be there inside the jpg headers of the file.
>>> wouldn't they?
>>>
>>> wouldn't they?

>> And they would be easily falsified, thus rendering your vaporware
>> "security camera" images inadmissible as evidence of any sort in any
>> court of law... which is, after all, sort of the point of a security
>> camera system, you moron. Conversely, embedded images, if the date and
>> time stamp were altered, could be analyzed and such fiddling easily
>> detected, you moron.

> clearly, you are an idiot.  people are arrested because of  
> non-time-stamped digital evidence every day.

And that "evidence" can easily be contested in court, because there's
no way to determine whether the file time and date has been changed.
Whereas an embedded time-and-date stamp in the image would be more
difficult to change without there being some evidence of having
tampered with the file. That is, after all, why *real* security
systems (as opposed to your vaporware bullshit lie of a "security
system") include date and time stamps in the images.

Clearly you are an idiot. LOL

> try again, loser.

Says the loser who knows so little about security systems that he's
already proven he's lying about having one. LOL

Where are those images from your vaporware multi-camera "security
system", DildoRider. LOL

Clearly you are an idiot. LOL

> my script would simply grab the timestamp out of the jpg headers and  
> overlay it on the image, btw.

Which would mean the image has been tampered with, which would
automatically exclude it as admissible in a court of law.

Clearly, you are an idiot. LOL

> therefore, according to your logic, it  
> would be easily analyzed and determined that the embedded and visible  
> timestamps are the same.  so what's the big deal again?

Because you're tampering with the original image, and there's no way
to determine if you tampered with the file timestamp to correspond to
the tampered image timestamp. Thus, any half-competent attorney would
have that image excluded as evidence.

Clearly, you are an idiot. LOL

>> So yet again you demonstrate that you have no fucking clue what you're
>> doing or talking about, mainly because you're lying out your gaping
>> anonymous-john rough-trade dating-website cock-ravaged tranny-faggoty
>> lying libtarded ass about the whole thing. LOL
>>
>> I note the whole chorus of <crickets> as regards that heavy
>> boot-stomping you received in the rest of my post.

> you should also note that you can't even answer a simple question asked of  
> you about the "porch gable" that you felt that you had to mention,  
> therefore ignoring the rest of your bullshit seems natural to me.

Says the moron who's now k'laming I said "gable roof", when he doesn't
even know what a gable is.

Clearly, you are an idiot. LOL

>> Moron. LOL
>> Libtard. LOL
>> DildoRider. LOL

> you forgot to snicker, fucktard.

Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Libtard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

Back to alt.california | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-14 23:58 -0500
  Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-14 23:19 -0700
  Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-12-15 07:44 +0100
    Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-15 07:16 -0700
      Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-15 11:02 -0500
        Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-15 09:12 -0700
    HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-15 10:59 -0500
      Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-15 09:26 -0700
        Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-15 11:44 -0500
      Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-12-16 06:19 +0100
        Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-16 00:35 -0500
          Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-12-17 17:59 +0100
            Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-17 12:18 -0500
              Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-17 11:25 -0700
              Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-12-18 06:05 +0100
                Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-17 23:30 -0700
                Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-18 10:34 -0500
            Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-17 11:24 -0700

csiph-web