Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.california > #286206

Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER?

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:59:23 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.x9p1t1h4tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:19:15 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> File datestamps can easily be manipulated, embedded date and time
>>> stamps, not so easily without being detected.
>
>> those would ALSO be there inside the jpg headers of the file.
>> wouldn't they?
>>
>> wouldn't they?
>
> And they would be easily falsified, thus rendering your vaporware
> "security camera" images inadmissible as evidence of any sort in any
> court of law... which is, after all, sort of the point of a security
> camera system, you moron. Conversely, embedded images, if the date and
> time stamp were altered, could be analyzed and such fiddling easily
> detected, you moron.

clearly, you are an idiot.  people are arrested because of  
non-time-stamped digital evidence every day.

try again, loser.

my script would simply grab the timestamp out of the jpg headers and  
overlay it on the image, btw.  therefore, according to your logic, it  
would be easily analyzed and determined that the embedded and visible  
timestamps are the same.  so what's the big deal again?

>
> So yet again you demonstrate that you have no fucking clue what you're
> doing or talking about, mainly because you're lying out your gaping
> anonymous-john rough-trade dating-website cock-ravaged tranny-faggoty
> lying libtarded ass about the whole thing. LOL
>
> I note the whole chorus of <crickets> as regards that heavy
> boot-stomping you received in the rest of my post.

you should also note that you can't even answer a simple question asked of  
you about the "porch gable" that you felt that you had to mention,  
therefore ignoring the rest of your bullshit seems natural to me.

>
> Moron. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
>

you forgot to snicker, fucktard.

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
 

Back to alt.california | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-14 23:58 -0500
  Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-14 23:19 -0700
  Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-12-15 07:44 +0100
    Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-15 07:16 -0700
      Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-15 11:02 -0500
        Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-15 09:12 -0700
    HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-15 10:59 -0500
      Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-15 09:26 -0700
        Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-15 11:44 -0500
      Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-12-16 06:19 +0100
        Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-16 00:35 -0500
          Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-12-17 17:59 +0100
            Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-17 12:18 -0500
              Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-17 11:25 -0700
              Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-12-18 06:05 +0100
                Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-17 23:30 -0700
                Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-18 10:34 -0500
            Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-17 11:24 -0700

csiph-web