Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.california > #286173

Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER?

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:19:15 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.x9oz1onytm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 01:44:47 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Where are those videos and time-stamped photos from your vaporware
>>>>> "security system"?
>
>>>> it doesn't time-stamp the image because i unchecked that option in the
>>>> config.
>
>>> Sure, because not time and date-stamping your *security* videos is
>>> such a good idea.
>
>> the name of the image file has the date and time.  pictures of squirrels
>> on my porch don't need a timestamp.
>
> File datestamps can easily be manipulated, embedded date and time
> stamps, not so easily without being detected.

those would ALSO be there inside the jpg headers of the file.  wouldn't  
they?
































































































































wouldn't they?

>
> So you don't have any video. And you've not presented any proof that
> you even have this cheap-ass time-lapse "security" system that doesn't
> keep time stamps on the images.
>
> Why haven't you presented any proof, DildoRider? Oh yeah, because you
> don't have any. Because you're lying. Again. LOL
>
>>> 150 IQ, or caught in a lie and desperately backpedaling? LOL
>
>> except, you are the one who is desperate to *prove* that you are a RL
>> stalker.
>
> You invited me to visit, I visited, you cowered behind your door as I
> knocked loudly. Now you're desperately backpedaling by k'laming me not
> to have visited, further k'laming that you have video "evidence" of
> this, yet you're somehow unable to post this fake "evidence" because
> you're lying. LOL
>
>>>> the filename is the date.  time-stamps can be added at anytime
>>>> afterward, dingus.  you must have me confused with someone else whom
>>>> you've pretended to stalk in real life, snickers.  that's probably all
>>>> that's going on here.
>
>>> Translation:
>>> "When caught in an obvious lie, as a kook it is incumbent upon me to
>>> LIE HARDER!"
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>
>> what's to lie about?  i save a bunch of image files in a directory and
>> their NAMES are what i see first.  why would i need to have a timestamp
>> already in the image?  the server i'm running it on is a compaq  
>> proliant.
>> i don't need to waste CPU cycles editing images in real time.
>> furthermore, my cameras aren't HD yet, so slapping a timestamp over the
>> original image causes loss of information.
>>
>> but you're so smart...
>
> Translation:
> "I'm blurting out all this detail because I'm lying, but I'm desperate
> to cover up the fact that I'm lying." LOL
>
>>>> they don't exist because my security software is set up to only record
>>>> when movement in certain zones of the image is detected.
>
>>> Translation:
>>> "When caught in an obvious lie, as a kook it is incumbent upon me to
>>> come up with some stupid reason to explain away my lack of ability to
>>> prove I'm not lying."
>
>> yes.  hence your repetitive "translations" from human-speak to
>> snickerSpeak.
>
> Translation:
> "When caught in a lie that I was using to cover up an even bigger lie,
> I take every opportunity to non sequitur in hopes I can divert
> attention away from the fact that I'm a lying piece of shit." LOL
>
>>> DildoRider's never heard of round-robin recording. 150 IQ? LOL
>
>> i certainly don't remove images, dipshit.  my system records when  
>> movement
>> is detected.  i don't need to dig through thousands of frames where
>> there's no action.  in fact, i can see that there are 10 imaqes in the
>> folder for today's date, all named with the timestamp.  mail must have
>> come early.
>
> And yet you can't post any of them because you're lying. Now you'll be
> forced to take your shitty cheap digital camera, position yourself on
> a step ladder to get a shot, change positions to get another angle
> because you've lied about having multiple cameras on the porch of your
> shitshack half-a-house hovel, fake up the date and time stamps on the
> files, then post them while crowing "SEE?! PROOOOOFFFF!" until it's
> shown that the EXIF data isn't from a video system, it's from a
> handheld camera, the angle of the sun doesn't correlate to the date
> and time stamp, and you can't replicate the exact angle of the shot
> when additional photo "proof" is asked for, whereupon you'll melt down
> with a CAPSphoam bleat, then disappear for awhile. Again. LOL
>
>>>> funny how you can't produce something tangible to support your
>>>> yip-yapping like a celphone pic of my porch or stickers on my front  
>>>> door or simply
>>>> describe things on my property not visible from google street view and
>>>> google satellite view, innit?
>
>>> I already provided a description of parts of your house that aren't
>>> visible except by visiting the property, DildoRider.
>
>> such as?  because i haven't heard you talk about anything that isn't
>> visible on google.
>
> DYOFDW, DildoRider. Your inability to comprehend what you read isn't
> anyone's problem but your own. I discussed several things you still
> needed to fix on the exterior, I discussed the lack of video cameras
> on your porch... then you started bleating out lie after lie about
> rich parents, got caught in that lie, then about rich relatives who
> would leave you "trust funds", got caught in that lie, then you
> started backpedaling from your admission that you dress up as a woman
> and troll dating websites for anonymous risky rough-trade
> one-night-stand rectalfests... all to cover up the fact that you got
> caught lying about having a multiple camera video security system on
> the porch of your shitshack half-a-house hovel. Moron. Lying Moron.
> Lying Faggoty Moron. LOL
>
>>> Now, why haven't you provided *any* video or photographic proof of
>>> your having a multi-camera video security system on your shitshack
>>> half-a-house hovel? LOL
>
>> what kind of idiot would expect someone to divulge the locations of  
>> their
>> hidden security cameras?
>>
>> ask yourself that question, snickers.
>
> Now it's sooooper sekret "hidden security cameras". LOL
>
> Next thing you know, DildoRider will be k'laming he's got titanium
> doors with perimeter deadbolts, barbed wire, guard dogs, armed guards
> and lethal boobytraps, and the fact that I'm even alive *proves* my
> not having been on his porch. Moron. LOL
>
>>>>> And now that you're k'laming there are "security
>>>>> cameras" (plural), you'll be forced to fake up multiple angles... oh,
>
>>>> no, you said there "weren't security cameras visible"... because you
>>>> looked on street view at pictures likely taken about 4 years ago AND  
>>>> the
>>>> camera(s?) is/are not meant to be obvious and, in fact, is/are blocked
>>>>  from view of your streetview driveby(TM) by the lush foliage in my  
>>>> yard
>>>> and so that's another telltale sign that you're a lying coward.
>
>>> Says the lying coward who hid in his house as I knocked loudly on the
>>> door...
>
>> yes, you knocked loudly on a door that had a doorbell.
>>
>> CLEARLY, you must have been here.  DUMBASS!
>
> Non sequitur as you squirm in trying to escape having been caught in a
> lie. As I've stated before, I never use the doorbell. I can knock
> louder than most doorbells can ring, and sometimes doorbells don't
> work... especially on shitshack half-a-house hovels that
> lower-middle-class faggoty retards pay too much for then brag about
> how much they've "made" on the property (although they've only
> averaged a "profit" of $36/month not taking into account upkeep and
> maintenance) simply because better houses than his overgrown
> ramshackle shitbox have appreciated in value around his dryrotted
> dilapidated crapshack. LOL
>
>>> then lied about having a security system. If you had one,
>>> you'd have already posted *any* video you've got from it.
>
>> never said it takes "video", idiot.  though, video is just a bunch of
>> still images strung together, so i guess "video" to you is 3 frames per
>> second or so.
>
> And yet you can't post any video *or* photographic proof to back up
> your lie about having a "ZoneMinder" security system with multiple
> cameras... if you could, you would have by now. Ergo, you've been
> caught in yet another of your many lies, DildoRider. LOL
>
>>> Your continuing failure to do so stands as all the proof anyone
>>> needs that you've been caught in yet *another* lie...
>
>> when you gonna *prove* your lie about being here?
>
> You have the security system photographic proof, DildoRider... oh,
> wait, no you don't, because you're lying about having a multi-camera
> security system on your porch. Just as you were lying about having
> "rich parents", which morphed into your lie that you had "rich
> relatives" who were going to leave you "trust funds" in their wills
> (proving the lie with your own words), just as you were lying when you
> tried to backpedal away from admitting you dress up as a woman and
> troll dating websites for anonymous risky rough-trade one-night-stand
> sex with dudes, just as you were lying when you tried to backpedal
> away from admitting that when you strike out on those websites, you
> beg your "girlfriend" to strap a dildo on so you can ride fake cock
> while you fantasize about real cock, just as you lie about being
> doubly-gay *because* you both ride cock and when you can't do that you
> ride fakecock, yet you k'lame that somehow makes you "bisexual" and
> *not* "doubly-gay". LOL
>
>>> like your lie that you have
>>> rich parents, or that you made a huge sum off your shitshack
>>> half-a-house hovel, or that you have "rich relatives" who are going to
>>> leave you "trust funds", or your denials that you admitted having a
>>> tranny dating website profile that you use to pick up anonymous
>>> rough-trade one-night-stand cock. LOL
>
> <crickets> LOL
>
>>>>> Liar. The program you k'lamed to be using does that by default.
>>>>> QED, you're a lying faggot. LOL
>
>>>> it might do it by default, but i changed the config to not timestamp
>>>> because i didn't want to block out details in the image for no reason  
>>>> or
>>>> use up cpu cycles.
>
>>> "use up CPU cycles" LOL!
>>> Because entering a time and date stamp is *so* CPU intensive. Lying
>>> backpedaling moron. LOL
>
>> it is for an enterprise class sever from 1994.  also, i don't need a
>> timestamp in the image in real time, moron.
>
> So you admit you can only afford computers from 1994. Yet you "made" a
> mint on your shitshack hovel, you have "rich parents", you have "rich
> relatives"... another of your lies exposed. LOL
>
>>> So your k'lamed shit security system doesn't even take video?
>
>> i didn't set it up for video.  why do i need video?
>
> Of course... you're so poor you have nothing worth stealing. Which is
> why you can only afford computers from 1994, and why you have no
> multi-camera video security system. More of your lies exposed. LOL
>
>>> And your computer is so underpowered that you can't spare a couple
>>> clock cycles to put the time and date stamp in the images. Yet
>>> you've *not* already written "a script to parse the filename and
>>> add the timestamp to the image", which would take *more* CPU cycles
>>> that doing it in real-time. 150 IQ, or lying backpedaling moron? LOL
>
>> i've never had to release an image to the public or to authorities.  if  
>> i
>> did, i would time stamp the image before releasing it.  that's what i
>> would have done if there was ever a 6'5" oaf on my porch being confused  
>> by
>> a doorbell that they couldn't see because they actually weren't there.
>
> Translation:
> "I'm desperate to cover up my lie about having a multi-camera security
> system hooked to a Tandy TRS-80 Model 4, which is the best computer I
> can afford. That's why I'm squirming so much, rather than just post
> some of the camera views... because that'd *prove* I'm lying." LOL
>
>>> Of course. Because your anonymous rough-trade one-night-stand
>>> cockfests aren't considered "dating"... unless you consider your
>>> pickup line "Looking for a date?" to classify it as such. LOL
>
>> i must go on lots of dates in your head.
>
> You've admitted you set up a tranny dating profile, DildoRider. But if
> you insist that you're such a pasty skinny emo goth AIDS-looking freak
> that you constantly strike out with your tranny dating profile, so be
> it. LOL
>
>>>> how exactly do i *prove* to a snickerTard who i'm related to, much  
>>>> less
>>>> whether i am in any particular person's will?
>
>>> Considering that you've been caught lying about your "rich parents",
>>> you can't. LOL
>
>> you mean the parents who just gave me $8000 as a gift recently because
>> they felt bad that i haven't asked them for anything for a decade?
>
> Another lie. LOL
>
> "My parents felt guilty because I'm so anti-social that I shut myself
> away from everyone because I'm embarrassed about admitting that I
> dress up as a tranny to troll dating websites for anonymous cock, so
> my parents gave me money because they felt it'd make up for their
> inability to give me love when I was younger, which is why I dress up
> as a tranny and troll dating websites for anonymous cock." LOL!
>
>>> Yeah, because your retired worker-bee parents *stopped* working to get
>>> rich. That's why they still live in that rural shithole. You're lower
>>> middle-class, as is your entire family. Deal with it, DildoRider. LOL
>
>> they invested every single penny wisely.  my dad was a federal safety
>> inspector in the mines for almost a quarter century before they shut
>> down.  he retired with USPS.  was that on your highly fucked radaris
>> dossier?  LOL
>
> That doesn't make them rich, DildoRider. That makes them "fixed
> income". LOL
>
>>> So you'll make an additional $4320 over the next "decade or more", not
>>> including upkeep and maintenance. Meanwhile, that shitshack is
>>> degenerating more. How old is it now? LOL
>
>> so where's it degenerating, exactly?
>
> You figure it out. You mean you didn't see all the dry rot? LOL
>
>>>>> And that $36 per month isn't factoring in such items as maintenance
>
>>>> maintenance that i have easily handled.  check out the cost of living  
>>>> in
>>>> pittsburgh, dingus.  i buy a tank of gas every month for my car, on
>>>> average, because i bike everywhere.  i put my money into my investment
>>>> which is my home, not in supporting oil wars, like by driving a hummer
>>>> like a douchebag, for instance.
>
>>> "i put my money into my investment which is my home" LOL
>>>
>>> If it's an investment, you don't have to keep putting money into it
>>> for 15 fucking years, you witless nong. LOL
>
>> i don't *have* to live in it either, but i do.  funny, that.  do you
>> figure i'd be better off trying to run a recording studio and a DIY
>> fabrication shop in a $400/mo "studio" apartment?  DUMBASS.
>
> "recording studio" LOL
> You "record" for those who have such shitty music they can't find
> anyone else to record for them. They might as well get a cassette tape
> recorder to make their "demo tapes", for all the good it'll do them.
> LOL
>
> "fabrication shop" LOL
> Is that for your five hundred clown cycles that you have to pedal at
> 8000 RPM to go 10 MPH? Why is the trials bike Wikipedia page
> cross-linked to clown unicycles? Do you wear a red nose and floppy
> shoes when you do your "trials", or just polka-dotted coveralls? LOL
>
>>> I'm set up so I can pay $150 / hour for my plumber to fix any plumbing
>>> problems, and write it off on my taxes. My plumber is me. So whereas
>>> your house is costing you, mine is not only appreciating like mad,
>>> it's offsetting taxable income. Moron.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>
>> sounds like a lot of hoops to jump through just to prove ones self to  
>> be a
>> cheap-ass un-american piece of shit.
>>
>> i bet you pulled shit like charge yourself 8 hours of work to replace an
>> old screw-type valve with a more reliable 1/4 turn, too.  great job,
>> asshole.
>
> It's all legal. That you're too stoooopid to utilize the loopholes in
> the law to minimize taxable income isn't anyone's fault but your
> own... and your parents. Maybe if they'd given a shit about you to
> begin with, they'd have taught you these sorts of things, and they
> wouldn't have felt so guilty about ruining your life and turning you
> gay that they needed to give you a paltry $8000 to assuage their
> guilt. But $8000, or less than a dollar a day for every day of your
> pathetic life... that's the price you put on their love, DildoRider.
> Like a cheap whore, you are. LOL
>
>>>> there are comparable homes on the market in my neighborhood that are
>>>> selling for $400,000.  the longer i wait and work on renovating, the
>>>> more my house is worth, despite what you think of an ancient picture  
>>>> of it
>>>> that google took before lots of work was done on it. (because you  
>>>> were never
>>>> here)
>
>>> No, I saw the new roof, the new roof flashing,
>
>> on my side maybe.  while you were busy lying about being here, the
>> property next door was still not sold.  that sale didn't finalize until
>> around september.
>
>>> the efflorescence removed from the brickwork,
>
>> except nobody did anything like that around here.
>
> Then why was the brickwork cleaner on your side of your shitshack
> half-a-house, DildoRider? You never high pressure sprayed the outer
> walls? LOL
>
>>> the vines taken off the east side of the house,
>
>> there were never vines on the east side of the house.  maybe you're
>> confusing a honeysuckle and some rose of sharon as a "vine"?  funny that
>> the east side of the house is the only side visible from street view,
>> though.  why don't you tell me something about the west side of the  
>> house
>> in the driveway alley?  hmmm?
>
> It had vines on it, too, but they were mostly dead... less sun, I
> assume. Also, you should do away with those glass block basement
> windows, or at least put metal grating over them. They're very easy to
> kick in. Moron.
>
>>> the new downspout...
>
>> what new downspout?  now, you're just making shit up.
>
> Message-ID: <f3ccbc4ab2587f883737e53a6095dde1@dizum.com>
> "also, in recent news, i just had a hundred-year-old slate roof and
> gutters replaced and my house wiring brought up to date.  now i'm
> working on stripping...". Lying Moron. LOL
>
>>> it's still an overgrown dry-rotted piece of shit. You should fix
>>> the porch gable.
>
>> show me a pic of what you're talking about, snickers.  i'll post a pic  
>> of
>> what it looks like 4 years after google took the pic that you are
>> referencing.
>
> If you can't see the dry rot, then you deserve to have your shitshack
> half-a-house hovel fall down around you, DildoRider. Go drop some more
> money into that fucking money pit. Maybe you'll break even in the next
> couple decades. LOL
>
>>>> free clue: there's not even a dilapidated about-to-fall-down tree at  
>>>> the
>>>> address right next door anymore.  the new owner fixed the roof and is
>>>> doing a bunch of other work to get it ready for a renter. also, i got  
>>>> a
>>>> new car a while ago.
>
>>> Red, right?
>
>> nope.  that's one of the neighbor's.  red civic that's been parking  
>> there
>> for about 6 years.  a new girl just moved into that art collective this
>> month and has another red car.
>
> Ah, that's what it was. A different car, so I assumed it was yours.
>
> Yeah, you sure live in a "good neighborhood"... you've had three car
> break-ins *on* *your* *little* *section* *of* *street* in the past
> three months. LOL
>
>> mine is a gray 2012 accord.  see them on
>> google?  no?  hold your breath and wait, snickers.  LOL
>>
>> now maybe we can all see the context of your desperate k'lames of  
>> stalking
>> me where i live.
>
> Awww, DildoRider forgets he *invited* me to visit. LOL
>
>> let's see how many years it takes for google to update
>> their imagery to show an additional red car and a gray accord in my
>> parking area while you keep pretending it's a real-time window that you
>> can peep through at your victims and try desperately to konvince them  
>> that
>> you "RILLY, RILLY" are a r/l stalkerPsycho.
>>
>> here's another hint: the yellow ford station wagon behind the house in  
>> the
>> parking area was the old lady's from next door before she left it
>> deteriorate for years before she fell ill and passed away.  that was
>> removed and scrapped 3 months ago.
>
> Nice bleatage, DildoRider. You're obviously perturbed by having been
> caught in several lies. LOL
>
>> i eagerly await your image (or verbose description) of the "porch gable"
>> that you claim needs to be repaired, snickers.  we'll get down to the
>> bottom of this.
>
> I've already described it. You've got dry rot. Moron.
>
> <snicker>
>


-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
 

Back to alt.california | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-14 23:58 -0500
  Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-14 23:19 -0700
  Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-12-15 07:44 +0100
    Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-15 07:16 -0700
      Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-15 11:02 -0500
        Re: BLAST FROM THE PAST: Poor stupid gullible libtards... Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-15 09:12 -0700
    HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-15 10:59 -0500
      Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-15 09:26 -0700
        Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-15 11:44 -0500
      Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-12-16 06:19 +0100
        Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-16 00:35 -0500
          Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-12-17 17:59 +0100
            Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-17 12:18 -0500
              Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-17 11:25 -0700
              Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-12-18 06:05 +0100
                Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-17 23:30 -0700
                Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-12-18 10:34 -0500
            Re: HAS ANYBODY EVER RUN ACROSS SOMEONE THIS DESPERATE TO *PROVE* THAT THEY ARE A R/L STALKER? Skeeter <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-17 11:24 -0700

csiph-web