Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14550

Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012 (Was: Theodore W. Gray Patent: 2029-01-09 Adjusted expiration)

From Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups comp.lang.prolog
Subject Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012 (Was: Theodore W. Gray Patent: 2029-01-09 Adjusted expiration)
Date 2025-06-15 04:04 +0200
Message-ID <102l9nr$qoh6$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References <102l89g$qg0l$1@solani.org> <102l8uh$qo9l$1@solani.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

So they came up with a patent already in 2012:

Programming in a precise syntax using natural language
https://patents.google.com/patent/US9851950B2

Is it not ChatGPT because ChatGPT doesn't show some
"precise syntax" interpretation of the NL language input?

Bye

P.S.: Google Gemini gives me:

Q: What is the integral of sin(x)/x from -pi to pi

A: a lot of precise mathML and ultimately:

Therefore, for your original integral: ≈3.7038

Conclusions: Either the patent is ignored,
or they get a penny for every nickel that
Google earns with Gemini Pro.

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> Ok, I am not in a hurry:
> 
>  > In a method for presenting information,
>  > an interactive document, for example, may
>  > be created that includes both an input
>  > expression and a result generated by
>  > evaluating the input expression, and where
>  > the input expression can be selectively hidden.
>  > https://patents.google.com/patent/US8407580
> 
> The fun thing will be the language will be
> not Mathematica programming language, which was
> inspired by term rewriting, basically a
> 
> term rewriting engine without Knuth Bendix
> completion. Instead it will be run by the
> Prolog programming language. Again a pragmatic
> 
> approach to logic without completness.
> Isn't that an amazing perspective?
> 
> LoL
> 
> Bye
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Already Mathematica didn't have Run Buttons
>> in their Notebooks in 1988, just press return:
>>
>> https://www.wolfram.com/notebooks/index.php.de?source=footer
>>
>> Same for creating new cells, if I am not mistaken
>> and remember well, if one was at the end of a Notebook,
>>
>> again the return key creates a new cell. Also no
>> Python Jupyter Nonsense, primarily executed at the
>>
>> client side and not create via server roundtips.
>>
>>
> 

Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Biggest Nonsense are Run Buttons in SWISH Notebooks Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 03:40 +0200
  Theodore W. Gray Patent: 2029-01-09 Adjusted expiration (Was: Biggest Nonsense are Run Buttons in SWISH Notebooks) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 03:50 +0200
    Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012 (Was: Theodore W. Gray Patent: 2029-01-09 Adjusted expiration) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 04:04 +0200
      Re: Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012 Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-15 09:29 +0200
        Re: Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012 Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-15 09:36 +0200
        REDUCE 1963 (Was: Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 13:52 +0200
          Best of both worlds / Franz Lisp GI/S (Was: REDUCE 1963) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 13:54 +0200
            Why forrays into web 2.0 are slow (Was: Best of both worlds / Franz Lisp GI/S) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 14:02 +0200
              Waste of time Java (not JavaScript) for Web (Was: Why forrays into web 2.0 are slow) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 14:10 +0200

csiph-web