Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14550
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012 (Was: Theodore W. Gray Patent: 2029-01-09 Adjusted expiration) |
| Date | 2025-06-15 04:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <102l9nr$qoh6$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <102l89g$qg0l$1@solani.org> <102l8uh$qo9l$1@solani.org> |
Hi, So they came up with a patent already in 2012: Programming in a precise syntax using natural language https://patents.google.com/patent/US9851950B2 Is it not ChatGPT because ChatGPT doesn't show some "precise syntax" interpretation of the NL language input? Bye P.S.: Google Gemini gives me: Q: What is the integral of sin(x)/x from -pi to pi A: a lot of precise mathML and ultimately: Therefore, for your original integral: ≈3.7038 Conclusions: Either the patent is ignored, or they get a penny for every nickel that Google earns with Gemini Pro. Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > Ok, I am not in a hurry: > > > In a method for presenting information, > > an interactive document, for example, may > > be created that includes both an input > > expression and a result generated by > > evaluating the input expression, and where > > the input expression can be selectively hidden. > > https://patents.google.com/patent/US8407580 > > The fun thing will be the language will be > not Mathematica programming language, which was > inspired by term rewriting, basically a > > term rewriting engine without Knuth Bendix > completion. Instead it will be run by the > Prolog programming language. Again a pragmatic > > approach to logic without completness. > Isn't that an amazing perspective? > > LoL > > Bye > > Mild Shock schrieb: >> Already Mathematica didn't have Run Buttons >> in their Notebooks in 1988, just press return: >> >> https://www.wolfram.com/notebooks/index.php.de?source=footer >> >> Same for creating new cells, if I am not mistaken >> and remember well, if one was at the end of a Notebook, >> >> again the return key creates a new cell. Also no >> Python Jupyter Nonsense, primarily executed at the >> >> client side and not create via server roundtips. >> >> >
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Biggest Nonsense are Run Buttons in SWISH Notebooks Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 03:40 +0200
Theodore W. Gray Patent: 2029-01-09 Adjusted expiration (Was: Biggest Nonsense are Run Buttons in SWISH Notebooks) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 03:50 +0200
Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012 (Was: Theodore W. Gray Patent: 2029-01-09 Adjusted expiration) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 04:04 +0200
Re: Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012 Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-15 09:29 +0200
Re: Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012 Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-15 09:36 +0200
REDUCE 1963 (Was: Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 13:52 +0200
Best of both worlds / Franz Lisp GI/S (Was: REDUCE 1963) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 13:54 +0200
Why forrays into web 2.0 are slow (Was: Best of both worlds / Franz Lisp GI/S) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 14:02 +0200
Waste of time Java (not JavaScript) for Web (Was: Why forrays into web 2.0 are slow) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-15 14:10 +0200
csiph-web