Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #360606
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 07:22 -0700 |
| References | <bc42ddaf-c97b-47fa-bc1e-cd8bb7938922@googlegroups.com> <ifCdnUsbeKLNhlHInZ2dnUU7_8ydnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Message-ID | <08c8d2b0-cbc7-4ff5-a8d5-3218284e9f65@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy |
| From | Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> |
On Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 2:21:39 PM UTC+10, tjrob137 wrote: > On 8/12/15 8/12/15 11:19 AM, Y wrote: > > If a system increases in entropy over time, then we should expect the state > > of that system to become less predictable over time. > > This is just plain wrong. You are using unacknowledged PUNS here. In particular > you are confused by the meanings of "entropy", "state", and "predictable". > > Consider the thermodynamics of a system consisting of some gas and its > environment; here "state" consists of specific values of the state variables of > the system, such as pressure, volume, temperature, entropy, .... the state of > the system is well defined and follows an appropriate state equation -- i.e. it > is PERFECTLY PREDICTABLE, independent of the value of its entropy. > > This OUGHT to be obvious, because the state is a MACROSCOPIC > quantity, while the "disorder" related to entropy is MICROSCOPIC. > > Your basic error is confusing "state" for the gas with "state" for the > individual atoms of the gas. As the entropy of the gas increases, the individual > atoms move in a more confusing way. But if you want to discuss the state of the > (many) individual atoms, you cannot use entropy or the other thermodynamic > quantities at all. > > IOW "the entropy of an atom" makes no sense. Neither does "the > temperature of an atom" or "the pressure of an atom". This is > because entropy, temperature, and pressure are all MACROSCOPIC > measures of a BULK material, and a single atom simply does not > meet the assumptions used in defining those terms. > > When you don't know what the words you use actually mean, you become become > confused, and make silly, incorrect statements, such as above. > > If you want to consider the "system" comprised of the universe > and all the stars and galaxies in it, the same situation holds > -- you cannot discuss entropy along with individual stars or > galaxies. You can discuss the macroscopic state of the universe > using concepts like temperature and entropy, but you cannot > combine that with a discussion of individual stars or galaxies. > > > Tom Roberts Sometimes when I think of entropy I think of 'state' of matter. Since during phase transitions entropy happens. Simple mistake. -y
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-12 09:19 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-12 09:22 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 12:09 -0500
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:02 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 14:12 -0500
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-12 12:36 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-12 12:42 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:36 -0500
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-12 18:33 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 14:51 -0500
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-12 13:03 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:37 -0500
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-12 14:42 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-12 14:44 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 16:45 -0500
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:52 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 18:00 -0500
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-12 17:25 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:19 -0500
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-12 23:21 -0500
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:50 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Felipe Delgado <fd@spreadspectrum.org> - 2015-08-13 18:59 +0000
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-14 20:13 -0500
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:22 -0700
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 16:50 +0200
Re: Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy Felipe Delgado <fd@spreadspectrum.org> - 2015-08-13 18:53 +0000
Binomial expansion to 4th power - entropy fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-13 06:35 -0700
csiph-web