Re: accelerating affecting mass?

Subject	Re: accelerating affecting mass?
Newsgroups	sci.physics
References	<LDc1B.48316$qd4.28202@fx13.fr7> <V9udnUlfabaPgdfEnZ2dnUU7-a3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <f2e59a65-d039-413f-95fd-212fdd605832@googlegroups.com>
From	Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com>
Date	2017-06-21 21:47 -0400
Message-ID	<-Medndl5O6FuvdbEnZ2dnUU7-InNnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 21/06/2017 4:59 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote:
> another idiot parrot
> 'the photon is massless
> and you get it by introducing the plank constant ??
>
> so news for you parrot
>
> THE PLANK CONSTANT CONTAINES MASS !
> THE ONLY MASS !
> GOT OT ONCE FOR  ALL??
> ---------------------------------------------
> NO MASS ''' THE  ONLYMASS - NO REAL PHYSICS
> ========================================
> SAIED OLD ''CATTO' PORAT
> ========================================
>
> Y.Porat
> ===================================

Planck's Constant = 6.62607004 × 10^-34 m^2 kg / s

Yes, it has some element of mass included inside, but you can't look at 
these constants in isolation, you have to look at the entire constant, 
as a lot of these units will drop right out during calculations. The 
mass actually refers to the energy equivalent when it comes to light.

-- 
Sent from Giganews on Thunderbird on my Toshiba laptop

Thread

accelerating affecting mass? Jevan Pipitone <nospam@jevan.com.au> - 2017-06-18 02:18 +1000
  Re: accelerating affecting mass? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-06-18 16:02 +0000
    Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 10:25 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-18 20:02 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-19 19:16 -0400
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 13:17 -0700
          Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-20 15:52 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-21 19:38 -0700
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-21 19:46 -0700
          Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-21 21:28 -0700
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-22 15:08 -0700
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-22 15:19 -0700
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-22 19:29 -0700
    Re: accelerating affecting mass? Jevan Pipitone <nospam@jevan.com.au> - 2017-06-21 01:58 +1000
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-06-20 17:28 +0000
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-06-20 17:34 +0000
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki> - 2017-06-20 17:37 +0000
          Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 13:24 -0700
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-20 15:47 -0700
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 14:38 -0700
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-22 18:29 -0700
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 14:45 -0700
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-22 18:35 -0700
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-20 12:39 -0500
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 13:19 -0700
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-20 15:53 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 17:30 -0700
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-21 21:31 -0400
          Re: accelerating affecting mass? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-22 02:22 +0000
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-22 18:13 -0400
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-23 01:53 +0000
                Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-23 12:58 -0400
                Re: accelerating affecting mass? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-23 18:33 +0000
                Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-23 15:19 -0400
                Re: accelerating affecting mass? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-23 21:09 +0000
  Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 10:25 -0700
    Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-18 20:03 -0700
  Re: accelerating affecting mass? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-20 09:41 -0700
  Re: accelerating affecting mass? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-06-21 03:13 -0400
    Re: accelerating affecting mass? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-21 01:59 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-06-21 21:47 -0400
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-06-22 16:45 +0000

csiph-web