Re: accelerating affecting mass?

From	"F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: accelerating affecting mass?
Date	2017-06-22 16:45 +0000
Organization	NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Message-ID	<oigs7h016vi@news7.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References	<LDc1B.48316$qd4.28202@fx13.fr7> <V9udnUlfabaPgdfEnZ2dnUU7-a3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <f2e59a65-d039-413f-95fd-212fdd605832@googlegroups.com> <-Medndl5O6FuvdbEnZ2dnUU7-InNnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 21:47:58 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote:

> 
> Planck's Constant = 6.62607004 × 10^-34 m^2 kg / s
> 
> Yes, it has some element of mass included inside ... The 
> mass actually refers to the energy equivalent when it comes to light.
>

That's not correct.

The unit to Planck's constant is energy-second.

In SI units, energy is expressed as a force (mass x acceleration)
operating through a distance: F * distance.  So in terms of
SI units energy is the ability to move a mass through a distance.

But energy is the capacity to do work in general and Plancks
constant can be expressed in terms of any energy expression,
such as electron volts.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

accelerating affecting mass? Jevan Pipitone <nospam@jevan.com.au> - 2017-06-18 02:18 +1000
  Re: accelerating affecting mass? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-06-18 16:02 +0000
    Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 10:25 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-18 20:02 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-19 19:16 -0400
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 13:17 -0700
          Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-20 15:52 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-21 19:38 -0700
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-21 19:46 -0700
          Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-21 21:28 -0700
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-22 15:08 -0700
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-22 15:19 -0700
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-22 19:29 -0700
    Re: accelerating affecting mass? Jevan Pipitone <nospam@jevan.com.au> - 2017-06-21 01:58 +1000
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-06-20 17:28 +0000
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-06-20 17:34 +0000
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki> - 2017-06-20 17:37 +0000
          Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 13:24 -0700
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-20 15:47 -0700
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 14:38 -0700
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-22 18:29 -0700
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 14:45 -0700
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-22 18:35 -0700
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-20 12:39 -0500
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 13:19 -0700
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-20 15:53 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 17:30 -0700
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-21 21:31 -0400
          Re: accelerating affecting mass? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-22 02:22 +0000
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-22 18:13 -0400
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-23 01:53 +0000
                Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-23 12:58 -0400
                Re: accelerating affecting mass? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-23 18:33 +0000
                Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-23 15:19 -0400
                Re: accelerating affecting mass? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-23 21:09 +0000
  Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 10:25 -0700
    Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-18 20:03 -0700
  Re: accelerating affecting mass? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-20 09:41 -0700
  Re: accelerating affecting mass? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-06-21 03:13 -0400
    Re: accelerating affecting mass? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-21 01:59 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-06-21 21:47 -0400
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-06-22 16:45 +0000

csiph-web